The study focuses on the 3D electro-hydrodynamic (EHD) instability for flow between to parallel electrodes with unipolar charge injection with and without cross-flow. Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) with two-relaxation time (TRT) model is used to study flow pattern. In the absence of cross-flow, the base-state solution is hydrostatic, and the electric field is onedimensional. With strong charge injection and high electrical Rayleigh number, the system exhibits electro-convective vortices. Disturbed by different perturbation patterns, such as rolling pattern, square pattern, and hexagon pattern, the flow patterns develop according to the most unstable modes. The growth rate and the unstable modes are examined using dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) of the transient numerical solutions. The interactions between the applied Couette and Poiseuille cross-flows and electroconvective vortices lead to the flow patterns change. When the cross-flow velocity is greater than a threshold value, the spanwise structures are suppressed; however, the cross-flow does not affect the streamwise patterns. The dynamics of the transition is analyzed by DMD. Hysteresis in the 3D to 2D transition is characterized by the non-dimensional parameter Y, a ratio of the coulombic force to viscous term in the momentum equation. The change from 3D to 2D structures enhances the convection marked by a significant increase in the electric Nusselt number. 1 0 cc c t Fe
Pattern transition after cross-flow applicationThis section studies the transitions of 3D to 2D patterns by applying the cross-flow to already developed square vortex structures, as shown in FIG. 3(a). With weak cross-flow, the systems transitions to oblique 3D vortex structures (oblique transverse and regular longitudinal structures coexist). The increased cross-flow yields a longitudinal rolling pattern, i.e., transverse structures are fully suppressed . FIG. 11 shows the time evolution of maximum * z u in Couette cross-flow. For lower cross-flow velocities (e.g., u * wall=2.40) and, therefore, weak shear stress, the maximum * z u decreases to an equilibrium value, that is somewhat greater than that for the rolling pattern flow (u * wall =2.75). Interestingly, with further increase in u * wall (e.g., u * wall=3.20), the equilibrium value of * z u may decrease below the value of the rolling pattern.And with even further increasing u * wall (e.g., u * wall=3.84), the equilibrium solution develops an oblique 3D structure with maximum uz that is greater than that of the rolling pattern. However, at u * wall = 3.88, a bifurcation occurs, and the steady-state solution has only 2D streamwise