Three-Dimensional Finite Elemental Analysis of Bone Stress near an Implant Placed at the Border between Mandible and Fibular Graft in Mandibular Reconstruction

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to use finite elemental analysis (FEA) to evaluate bone stress near an implant placed at the border between the mandible and fibular graft in mandibular reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A fibular model (FM) and transplantation model (TM) were constructed for FEA. In TM, mandible was on the mesial side and the fibular graft was on the distal side. The implant was positioned at the center of both bone models. In TM, it was placed on the border between the mandible and fibular graft. A 10-mm implant was used in the monocortical model and a 15-mm implant was used in the bicortical model. The loading force was set at 100 N, the angle was set at 90˚, and the loading position was set as center, mesial, or distal on the upper surface of the prosthesis. Von Mises equivalent stress values of the bone near the implant collar and apex at the middle line between buccal and lingual side were measured. Results: In all models, stress values were significantly lower with center loading than with distal loading and mesial loading. In center loading, the stress values were significantly lower in the bicortical model than in the monocortical model. There were no significant differences in stress values between FM and TM in all conditions. Conclusions: Bone stress was least with the center loading position, which was further decreased by bicortical fixation. There was no increase in mechanical stress associated with placing an implant at the border between the mandible and the fibular graft.

3D Finite Element Study on: Bar Splinted Implants Supporting Partial Denture in the Reconstructed Mandible

“…FEA was used for studying different designs for prosthetic rehabilitation of reconstructed mandibles. That, the stress level on the bone graft can be determined and quantified in every portion of the reconstructed mandible in addition to evaluation of prosthetic components deformations by the help of such studies [ 24 - 27 ].…”

“…Frictional contact between prosthesis, clips, and bar was defined by the elements CONTACT 174 and TARGET 170 as surface to surface contact [ 23 ]. In addition, the model was fixed in place at TMJ top surface as a boundary condition, while loads were applied in a vertical direction (tissue ward and tissue away) perpendicular to the occlusal surfaces, at the central fossa of the lower first molar for each model as 100N [ 24 ]. The solid modeling and linear static analysis FEA were performed on a personal computer Intel Pentium Core 2 Duo, processor 3.0 GHz, 4.0GB RAM.…”