2006
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeb.49.1133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Flow Measurement by Digital Holographic Particle Image Velocimetry with Spatio-Temporal Derivative Method (Evaluation of the Measurement Accuracy by Numerical Simulation)

Abstract: In this paper, we present a digital holographic particle image velocimetry (DHPIV) technique with a spatio-temporal derivative method for velocity measurement in 3D space and the results of evaluating on its measurement accuracy. In this technique, hologram patterns are observed as digital images using an electronic camera, such as CCD or CMOS, and image reconstruction is carried out on a personal computer. Since an in-line observation system is utilized in conventional digital holography, a numerically recons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lu et al, 2008), various criteria have been proposed for detecting the best in-focus plane of a particle (e.g. Yamaguchi et al, 2006). Here, we defined the in-focus particle depth position as the location where the reconstructed light intensity averaged over the reconstructed particle image, was locally minimal.…”
Section: Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al, 2008), various criteria have been proposed for detecting the best in-focus plane of a particle (e.g. Yamaguchi et al, 2006). Here, we defined the in-focus particle depth position as the location where the reconstructed light intensity averaged over the reconstructed particle image, was locally minimal.…”
Section: Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most current digital PIV and LSV imply the use of cross-correlation analysis in order to obtain information about velocities. 31 that the inline holography method cannot reliably determine the particle. In this case, the image correlation algorithm gives the mean displacement of this mixed structure, which leads to noise and poor accuracy.…”
Section: Postprocessing and Analysis Of Particle Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle's depth position (x 2 ) was determined by the location where the reconstructed light intensity averaged over the reconstructed particle image, was locally minimal (see Sabban and van Hout 2011). Because of in-depth position inaccuracy inherent to single view holography technique (e.g., Yamaguchi et al 2006, Lu et al 2008, we fitted the determined x 2 in-focus positions that suffered from high noise levels, by a second order polynomial, assigning increased weight to the start and end positions that were carefully manually checked.…”
Section: Hologram Reconstruction and Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%