1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.1999.842826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional geometric point response correction in rotating slant-hole (RSH) SPECT

Abstract: The quality and quantitative accuracy of SPECT images are degraded by effects of attenuation, scatter, noise, geometric response, septal penetration and intrinsic crystal resolution. The geometric response has a significant degrading effect on spatial resolution, and can introduce spatial distortions because it is non-stationary. In this study we have characterized the geometric response function for RSH collimators and implemented depth dependent correction for this effect. The GRF for RSH was found to be asy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The point response function is symmetric for the conventional parallel-hole collimator. However, for the slant-hole collimator, the point response function is asymmetric (13). The point response function is elongated in the direction of angle β as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point response function is symmetric for the conventional parallel-hole collimator. However, for the slant-hole collimator, the point response function is asymmetric (13). The point response function is elongated in the direction of angle β as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attenuation and the depth dependent geometric response function (GRF) were modeled in the PH as well as in the FSSH projection data [28] (Fig. 4).…”
Section: B Simulated Phantom Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the resolution of the reconstructed images, for the three imaging geometries, was comparable after GRF compensation. The GRF for the FSSH collimator is asymmetric [28] and depends on the direction of the slant angle. The reconstructed images with GRF compensation, corresponding to iteration number 5, 6, and 6 for PH180, FSSH120, and Corresponding slices for the FSSH120 and FSSH180 imaging geometries are given in (b) and (c), respectively.…”
Section: Physical Phantom Studymentioning
confidence: 99%