2020
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2019.2898607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Guidance for Various Target Motions With Terminal Angle Constraints Using Twisting Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that these terminal angle constrained guidance laws are developed in a planar case, which assumes decoupled three-dimensional (3D) engagement dynamics. However, a real 3D interception is more practical for guidance law design, which attracts the recent study on the design of 3D guidance laws [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Thus, it is of practical significance to investigate the terminal angle constrained guidance law in the 3D space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these terminal angle constrained guidance laws are developed in a planar case, which assumes decoupled three-dimensional (3D) engagement dynamics. However, a real 3D interception is more practical for guidance law design, which attracts the recent study on the design of 3D guidance laws [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Thus, it is of practical significance to investigate the terminal angle constrained guidance law in the 3D space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], Radau Pseudospectral Method (RPM) was adopted to obtain the optimization trajectories of two vehicles with variablesweep wings and fixed wings respectively. In [12], a twisting control-based guidance law considering nonlinear/coupled dynamics and terminal angle constraints was proposed in a three-dimensional space. In [13] [14], an analytical threedimensional guidance law, considering nonlinear coupled dynamics and the constraints of impact angle and field-ofview, was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the lack of the guidance subsystem, the control lag caused by the large inertia of UAV cannot be solved. Line of sight (LOS) guidance is the most widely used among guidance methods due to its simplicity and ease of implementation and many control strategies combined with LOS has been proposed to meet various practical needs, including unmanned surface vehicle (Jiang et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2015; Rout et al, 2020; Woo et al, 2019) underwater vehicles (Sahu and Subudhi, 2017; Wang et al, 2020) and unmanned aerial vehicle (Chen et al, 2016; Chen et al, 2019; He et al, 2017; Hu et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2019; Zheng and Zou, 2016; Zuo et al, 2019), these LOS-based control strategies can compensate for control lag, but the optimized indicators are generally designed as the shortest settling time and the minimum path deviation, which inevitably leads to overshoot of the following path. This paper therefore introduces a novel guidance and control system based on the IPSO algorithm, the LOS guidance law and the PI controller, which can meet the needs of fast non-overshoot control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%