2017
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.16.03041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional HyCoSy With Perfluoropropane-Albumin Microspheres as Contrast Agents and Normal Saline Injections Into the Pelvic Cavity for Morphological Assessment of the Fallopian Tube in Infertile Women

Abstract: Combination of 3D HyCoSy with normal saline injected into the pelvic cavity may be a feasible and safe procedure to assess tubal patency and adhesions of the fimbrial parts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It had been reported that ovarian mobility is a sonographic “soft marker” in evaluating deep infiltrating endometriosis and extensive pelvic adhesions, both of which are associated with subfertility [ 27 , 28 ]. Furthermore, some research has indicated that injective resistance and contrast agent venous intravasation are associated with diagnostic results [ 8 , 21 – 30 ]; however, which of these is most relevant to pregnancy has not been reported. Our univariate analysis showed that patency of the tubes, mobility of the ovaries, and injective resistance are related to pregnancy after HyCoSy exam and that contrast agent venous intravasation and the identity of the sonographer are not related to pregnancy after HyCoSy exam, whereas multivariate analysis showed that patent fallopian tubes and no injective resistance were the related factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had been reported that ovarian mobility is a sonographic “soft marker” in evaluating deep infiltrating endometriosis and extensive pelvic adhesions, both of which are associated with subfertility [ 27 , 28 ]. Furthermore, some research has indicated that injective resistance and contrast agent venous intravasation are associated with diagnostic results [ 8 , 21 – 30 ]; however, which of these is most relevant to pregnancy has not been reported. Our univariate analysis showed that patency of the tubes, mobility of the ovaries, and injective resistance are related to pregnancy after HyCoSy exam and that contrast agent venous intravasation and the identity of the sonographer are not related to pregnancy after HyCoSy exam, whereas multivariate analysis showed that patent fallopian tubes and no injective resistance were the related factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed that when the amount of normal saline injection reached 40–120 mL (average 80 mL), it could achieve an ideal display effect. The amount was still significantly less than that needed by transvaginal posterior fornix puncture 16 . In this study, when SIPS via intrauterine route combined with another contrast mode of HyCosy called 2D‐FS, the combination's diagnostic efficacy for assessing tubal patency was similar to that of D3D‐HS, but on the other hand, its ability of locating the fimbrial parts was much better than the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…(3) Patient's acceptance is limited. Moreover, a large amount of normal saline (1000–1500 mL) 16 needs to be injected to expose the areas of interest (especially when the fimbrial parts' position are opposite to the direction of gravity), which will add to the patient's discomfort. We chose the intrauterine route to inject normal saline through the natural cavity which can reduce the shortcomings mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelvic adhesions can induce the oviduct to be lifted, or cause excessive distortion and a complex image of the oviduct. 12 The oviduct is pulled by the lateral adhesion to change the original distributions, the outflow of contrast agent from the oviduct fimbria can flow to the periphery of the contralateral ovary, and adhesion can make the distal oviduct to go beyond the scope of scanning, making it difficult to distinguish whether the distal oviduct is unobstructed or obstructed. In a two-dimensional ultrasound examination, the topographical relationship of the ovary and uterus can roughly predict the distribution of the oviduct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%