2007
DOI: 10.2202/1934-2659.1068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamics and Reaction Kinetics Analysis in FCC Riser Reactors

Abstract: Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is the refinery process for the conversion of high molecular-weight hydrocarbons to produce higher valuable products such as gasoline. The optimization of FCC process is challenging due to the complex interactions between a large number of dependent and independent parameters. One of the most uncertain aspects of a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit is the description of fluid-solid mixing at the riser entrance. Most of the existing models assume an instant mixing of solids and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 10a, it can be decided that the solids volume fraction rises near the wall and annular flow is observed as in Das et al 3 As seen in Figure 10b, the solids velocity is found to increase over the riser height. This is a consequence of, (i) the cracking of the heavy gas oil into low molecular weight components such as gasoline, LPG, and dry gas, 29, 30, 31 (ii) a higher annular region thickness (see Figure 10b) in the top section of the riser decreasing the effective flow area significantly, and (iii) the gas‐phase pressure in the top section of the riser being lower than the bottom value due to the hydrostatic head of the solid. A low‐pressure in the top section of the riser increases the velocity of the gas phase when compared with the velocity of the gas phase in the bottom section of the riser.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 10a, it can be decided that the solids volume fraction rises near the wall and annular flow is observed as in Das et al 3 As seen in Figure 10b, the solids velocity is found to increase over the riser height. This is a consequence of, (i) the cracking of the heavy gas oil into low molecular weight components such as gasoline, LPG, and dry gas, 29, 30, 31 (ii) a higher annular region thickness (see Figure 10b) in the top section of the riser decreasing the effective flow area significantly, and (iii) the gas‐phase pressure in the top section of the riser being lower than the bottom value due to the hydrostatic head of the solid. A low‐pressure in the top section of the riser increases the velocity of the gas phase when compared with the velocity of the gas phase in the bottom section of the riser.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the parameters used in this simulation and were obtained from industry and literature. (Han and Chung, 2001b, Nuhu et al, 2012, Ahari et al, 2008 Variable…”
Section: Degree Of Freedom Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The riser unit has many sections; feed preheater, the vaporization section and the riser, which are sometimes modelled differently. Although an attempt to simulate the riser unit with varied diameter (between 1 m at the bottom to 1.4 m at the top) was made (Novia et al, 2007), only a quarter of the riser was considered because they modelled the riser unit in two sections; the vaporization section (found to have no chemical reactions) as 1 m diameter and the riser section as 1.4 m, a uniform cross section. They also included the vaporization section in the riser unit model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic data for cracking reactions are shown in Table 1. The reaction kinetics is merged into the mathematical model by solving the species equations of the components in the form of chemical reaction rates [18]. Equations ( 21)-( 23) are used to describe the reaction kinetics of 3-lump kinetic model:…”
Section: Reaction Schemementioning
confidence: 99%