2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional hydrostratigraphical modelling supporting the evaluation of fluoride enrichment in groundwater: Lakes basin (Central Ethiopia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S7). In agreement with the conceptual hydrogeological model of the area by (Ghiglieri et al, 2020) C1 can be interpreted as a fully saturated aquifer system within pyroclastics (ignimbrites) and basalts, where water from the rift shoulders flows into the rift valley.…”
Section: Doisupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S7). In agreement with the conceptual hydrogeological model of the area by (Ghiglieri et al, 2020) C1 can be interpreted as a fully saturated aquifer system within pyroclastics (ignimbrites) and basalts, where water from the rift shoulders flows into the rift valley.…”
Section: Doisupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In agreement with the conceptual hydrogeological model of the study area by Ghiglieri et al (2020), the conductor C1 images a shallow layer of pyroclastics and lavas that has been classified as a fissured aquifer. Considering reported groundwater electrical conductivities in the area , the most widely distributed observed bulk conductivities within C1 (σ = 0.1 − 0.2 S/m) would require an unreasonably large fluid fraction within C1 (see SI: Text S6.2).…”
Section: C1: Aquifer/sediment Unitsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Following the conceptual hydrogeological model of the study area (Ghiglieri et al., 2020), the conductor C1 images a shallow layer of pyroclastics and lavas that has been classified as a fissured aquifer. Considering reported groundwater electrical conductivities with a mean of 0.3 S/m in the area (Burnside et al., 2021), the most widely distributed observed bulk conductivities within C1 ( σ = 0.1–0.2 S/m) would require an unreasonably large fluid fraction within C1 (see Text S6.2 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%