2020
DOI: 10.1177/1475921720918675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional image coordinate-based missing region of interest area detection and damage localization for bridge visual inspection using unmanned aerial vehicles

Abstract: In this study, the three-phase missing region of interest area detection and damage localization methodology based on three-dimensional image coordinates was proposed. In Phase 1, the coordinate transformation is performed by the position and attitude information of the unmanned aerial vehicles and camera, and the coordinates of the center point of each acquired image are obtained with the distance information between the camera and the target surface. For Phase 2, the size of the field of view of every acquir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the need for additional UAV flight by calculating the acquired image coordinates and identifying the missing areas should be considered. In this study, the image coordinate estimation proposed by Yoon et al 24 was adopted to identify whether missing area is detected in ROI. In their study, they calculated the 3‐D image coordinates of the target bridge by employing the UAV and camera pose, GPS location, and distance measurements.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, the need for additional UAV flight by calculating the acquired image coordinates and identifying the missing areas should be considered. In this study, the image coordinate estimation proposed by Yoon et al 24 was adopted to identify whether missing area is detected in ROI. In their study, they calculated the 3‐D image coordinates of the target bridge by employing the UAV and camera pose, GPS location, and distance measurements.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jung et al 23 used UAV pose and GPS location, relative to the target structure, combined with camera pose, to develop accurate 3‐D maps of bridges for autonomous inspection and damage detection. Similarly, Yoon et al 24 used UAV and camera pose and distance to the target structure to develop a methodology to identify accurately the location and extent of structural damage. These results indicate that both UAV and camera pose, combined with the distance to the target structure, provide enhanced inspection and monitoring performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Similar methods were also suggested, such as performing coordinate transformation by the position and attitude information of the UAS, 41 and the coordinates of each acquired image center can be obtained with the distance information between the camera and the target surface. [42][43] The other kind of method is to splice the images of the surface to obtain a panoramic view of the structural surface. The collected and identified images containing damage can also be directly displayed on the mosaic.…”
Section: Damage Location Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[131]- [136], [143], [150] Spalling [11], [62]- [65], [67], [81] [60], [61], [105], [106], [108], [115], [132], [134] Efflorescence [10], [11], [43], [45], [54], [58], [62]- [65], [67], [81] [60], [132] Exposed rebar [11], [62], [64], [65], [67], [70] [60], [108], [115], [150] Generic/others [10], [11], [54], [62]- [65], [67], [80], [81] [60], [108], [132], [150] Steel Corrosion [10], [11], [45], [54], [62]-…”
Section: Concretementioning
confidence: 99%