1997
DOI: 10.1023/b:plso.0000009694.64377.6f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with X-ray Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For plants grown in soil, x-ray CT techniques and magnetic resonance imaging (Heeraman et al, 1997;Nagel et al, 2009;Tracy et al, 2010;Lucas et al, 2011;Zhu et al, 2011) have recently increased our capabilities to visualize root system architecture in situ nondestructively. For example, the x-ray CT technique can be used to study root architectures under varying nutrient, moisture, temperature, and soil density conditions in a physiologically relevant way over time.…”
Section: How To Image Root Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For plants grown in soil, x-ray CT techniques and magnetic resonance imaging (Heeraman et al, 1997;Nagel et al, 2009;Tracy et al, 2010;Lucas et al, 2011;Zhu et al, 2011) have recently increased our capabilities to visualize root system architecture in situ nondestructively. For example, the x-ray CT technique can be used to study root architectures under varying nutrient, moisture, temperature, and soil density conditions in a physiologically relevant way over time.…”
Section: How To Image Root Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, this can be downscaled using x-ray CT, although the low-throughput and sample size:resolution trade-off remain a constraint . Less extensively, magnetic resonance imaging has been used in a similar way to study root architecture in situ, as has neutron tomography (Heeraman et al, 1997). In all these approaches, however, cost, effort, the limited throughput, and accessibility (e.g., limited availability of synchrotron beam time for neutron tomography) are still major drawbacks.…”
Section: Root System Architecture In the Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging techniques for the visualization of soilgrown root systems in two and three dimensions include x-ray computed tomography (Heeraman et al, 1997;Tracy et al, 2010;Mooney et al, 2012), neutron radiography (NR; Oswald et al, 2008), and magnetic resonance imaging (Pohlmeier et al, 2008). NR is one of the most suitable techniques to investigate roots grown in soil, because it allows a high throughput, provides a strong contrast between roots and soil, and therefore requires little effort for image processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, HRCT and SRXTM are the most useful methods to visualize both internal and external morphology and anatomy in a noninvasive and nondestructive manner, and are useable for a range of specimen sizes. HRCT has been used in plant sciences to examine structure and morphology of extant flowers and fruits (1; see also the Digital Morphology digital library of the University of Texas at Austin, www.digimorph.org), density of extant woods (2,3), spatial distribution of root systems (4)(5)(6), and light interception of the tree canopy (7,8). In paleobotany, CT has been used in a few cases to reveal internal structures, including in Paleozoic charophytes (9), silicified Cycadeoidea stems and Araucaria mirabilis cones from the Jurassic (10), an undescribed Cretaceous gymnosperm fructification (11,12), a Paleogene hymenophyllaceous fern rhizome (13), and Eocene myrtaceous fruits (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%