2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11770-012-0308-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional interpretation of sparse survey line MT data: Synthetic examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works [Siripunvaraporn et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2011aLin et al, , 2012 have proved that reliable 3-D structure close to the sparse lines can be obtained by 3-D inversion. To clearly understand the complex deep structures beneath Namche Barwa, four vertical cross sections ( Figure 6) close to the MT lines are plotted along both the SW-NE direction (AA 0 ) and NW-SE direction (BB 0 , CC 0 , and DD 0 ).…”
Section: Inversion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous works [Siripunvaraporn et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2011aLin et al, , 2012 have proved that reliable 3-D structure close to the sparse lines can be obtained by 3-D inversion. To clearly understand the complex deep structures beneath Namche Barwa, four vertical cross sections ( Figure 6) close to the MT lines are plotted along both the SW-NE direction (AA 0 ) and NW-SE direction (BB 0 , CC 0 , and DD 0 ).…”
Section: Inversion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A synthetic test is presented to investigate whether the observed conductive zones and resistive regions can be constrained by these sparse data and limited frequency range used. Although previous synthetic and field examples [ Siripunvaraporn et al ., ; Lin et al ., , ] have demonstrated that reasonable 3‐D structure close to the sparse lines can be obtained by 3‐D inversion, the targets in those examples are shallower than the structures in this study. In order to assess the reliability and resolution capability of our observed data, we designed the model in Figure a and computed the synthetic responses with Gaussian noise at the same frequencies of 194–0.00275 Hz at the same 83 sparse sites.…”
Section: Three‐dimensional Resistivity Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%