1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(94)02643-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional modeling of canopy tree interception of wind-driven rainfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
61
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Epiphytes intercepting rainwater and disrupting stemflow pathways on the epiphyte-covered trees likely diminished stemflow yield compared to the bare canopies. Elevated stemflow yield from bare cedar trees at the study site compared to other studies on the same species, however, may be a function of meteorological variables not measured (i.e., wind conditions [27]) or neighborhood conditions along the forest edge that improved individual trees' ability to entrain rainfall as stemflow [30].…”
Section: Hydrometeorologymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epiphytes intercepting rainwater and disrupting stemflow pathways on the epiphyte-covered trees likely diminished stemflow yield compared to the bare canopies. Elevated stemflow yield from bare cedar trees at the study site compared to other studies on the same species, however, may be a function of meteorological variables not measured (i.e., wind conditions [27]) or neighborhood conditions along the forest edge that improved individual trees' ability to entrain rainfall as stemflow [30].…”
Section: Hydrometeorologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Stemflow volumes from the sampled bare cedar trees were 2-5 times greater than observed beneath the epiphyte-covered cedars ( Table 1). The sum of throughfall and stemflow exceeded total rainfall for the 30 July storm (9.2 mm net rainfall versus 8.9 mm gross rainfall), which is a common artifact observed when throughfall drip points are oversampled [26], rainfall is undersampled, or wind conditions permit greater three-dimensional rainfall capture area than represented by two-dimensional projected canopy areas [27]. …”
Section: Hydrometeorology For Sampled Stormsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, WDR can cause a significant spatial heterogeneity of the throughfall and stemflow in forest regions, which leads to errors in the estimated value of RI [Herwitz and Slye, 1995]. While WDR has a significant influence on the estimated value of RI, most studies on RI in the literature have not taken WDR into consideration.…”
Section: Effects Of Wdr On Rimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] Wind can tilt rainfall from the vertical direction, which is known as wind-driven rain (WDR) [Herwitz and Slye, 1995;Sevruk and Nespor, 1998;Blocken and Carmeliet, 2004]. In the presence of WDR, (1) the rainfall rate at the canopy surface becomes spatially heterogeneous, (2) local circulation may be induced by wind around the rain gauge, and (3) raindrops that have landed on the canopy surface may be transported away from the canopy by wind.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation