Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0817-1_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Dimensional Modeling of Projection Radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…using Monte Carlo methods [1, 2]). The most easy approximation is to neglect the sources of characteristic radiation inside the object and the scattering processes [3,4]. Then the transport equation (1) becomes a homogeneous differential equation.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using Monte Carlo methods [1, 2]). The most easy approximation is to neglect the sources of characteristic radiation inside the object and the scattering processes [3,4]. Then the transport equation (1) becomes a homogeneous differential equation.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matched filtering is ideally suited for application to radiographie nondestructive testing because of the recent availability of radiographic inspection models [8] in which apriori information from a CAD model of the pan can be incorporated into the filter. In addition, the expected overall flaw morphology is often known ahead of time.…”
Section: Matched Filter Background and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 1-3 show the original flat-plate images with their corresponding results after matched filtering. The original images were generated using the x-ray simulation model of Gray et al [9] and have flaw signal-to-noise ratios of 4.1 dB, -4.4 dB and -10 dB, respectively. The signal-to-noise ratios of the filtered images are 30 dB, 20 dB and 19 dB, respectively.…”
Section: Pracfical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeled ultrasonic testing components included the waves radiated by the probes (for the pitch-catch technique), wave modification by sample geometry, defect effects on wave scattering and propagation, and the effects of signal processing and display. Similar models have been developed for eddy current examination by Auld et al [6) and for x-ray radiography by Gray [7).…”
Section: Uses Of Measurement Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Important modifications yet to be completed include the inclusion of the ability to handle flaws and nonhomogeneous materials. It should be pointed out that X-ray scattering can also be treated by the methods developed in this code [7].…”
Section: Chapter 5 Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%