2007
DOI: 10.3109/10929080701627019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional modeling system for unilateral mandibular bone distraction: A clinical case

Abstract: Facial hemiatrophies are anomalies of the first branchial arch and affect one in 4000-5000 newborns. Bone distraction is the technique of choice for the treatment of these dysmorphoses. Mandibular osteodistraction requires prior determination of the characteristics of the distraction vector whose three components will serve to activate the distractor. The patient, aged 5 years, presented with a right facial hemiatrophy, Grade IB according to the classification of Pruzansky. Tomodensitometric acquisition was ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies from our group (Pendas et al 2002;Varela et al 2005) and others (Bergo et al 2002) have partially characterized the phenotype in two different strains of Zmpste24 mutant mice. The whole aspect of the cranium of Zmpste24-deficient mice accurately studied with simple radiology and μCT displayed features of reduced growth rate with respect to the control littermates, based on maxillary vector growth (see Diemunsch et al 2007), which has an anterior-superior direction in control animals whereas is flattened (more horizontal) in the mutants (F.d.C. et al unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies from our group (Pendas et al 2002;Varela et al 2005) and others (Bergo et al 2002) have partially characterized the phenotype in two different strains of Zmpste24 mutant mice. The whole aspect of the cranium of Zmpste24-deficient mice accurately studied with simple radiology and μCT displayed features of reduced growth rate with respect to the control littermates, based on maxillary vector growth (see Diemunsch et al 2007), which has an anterior-superior direction in control animals whereas is flattened (more horizontal) in the mutants (F.d.C. et al unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%