2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional molecular basket sorbents for CO2 capture: Effects of pore structure of supports and loading level of polyethylenimine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
46
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was suggested that as a greater volume of amine was loaded onto the carbon support, transport to the active sites was limited due to a blocking effect where the CO 2 had difficulty accessing the active sites. These findings support the conclusions from recent studies of PEI impregnated silica materials [25].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was suggested that as a greater volume of amine was loaded onto the carbon support, transport to the active sites was limited due to a blocking effect where the CO 2 had difficulty accessing the active sites. These findings support the conclusions from recent studies of PEI impregnated silica materials [25].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There are a large number of promising reports in the literature on the potential of silicas loaded with a variety of amines [15e24]. A recent paper by Wang et al [25] compared different mesoporous silicas and emphasized the importance of pore structure for efficient utilization of amine on the support. However, there is a difference in terms of the loading of the amine onto the carbon support, as the cohesive properties of the silica and carbon surfaces will vary [2,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13] The most common way to obtain amine functionalized solid sorbents is the impregnation of highly-ordered porous supports with low molecular amines or amino polymers. [14][15][16] A well-structured porosity and large pore volumes are among the most important characteristic of the supports making SBA-15 or MCM-41 often the material of choice. [17][18] High molecular weight amines that contain several primary, secondary or tertiary amine groups, i.e., tetraethylenpentamine (TEPA) or polyethyleneimine (PEI), are frequently employed in the impregnation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, various other materials were selected as supports such as activated carbon, carbon black, TUD-1, mesocellular siliceous foam (MCF) and MSU-J, etc. [28][29][30] , because the structure of the support material may also affect the CO 2 sorption properties of MBS. A sponge-like material TUD-1 was explored as the support to prepare MBS for CO 2 capture, and the results indicated that with 50 wt% PEI loading the highest CO 2 sorption capacity was obtained at 75 °C [29] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon based MBS was evaluated by using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and a fixed-bed flow sorption system [28] , which showed higher CO 2 sorption capacity due to the higher pore volume and larger pore size. Wang et al [30] used mesocellular siliceous foam (MCF), MSU-J and hexagonal mesoporous silica (HMS) as supports to prepare the threedimensional (3-D) MBS and studied the CO 2 sorption performance with TGA. It was observed that support materials exert positive effect on the CO 2 sorption capacity [30] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%