2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0263034603213069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional multimode Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities at all density ratios

Abstract: The three-dimensional~3D! turbulent mixing zone~TMZ! evolution under Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov conditions was studied using two approaches. First, an extensive numerical study was made, investigating the growth of a random 3D perturbation in a wide range of density ratios. Following that, a new 3D statistical model was developed, similar to the previously developed two-dimensional~2D! statistical model, assuming binary interactions between bubbles that are growing at a 3D asymptotic velocity. Confi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that in the paper by Kartoon et al [5], they observe a ratio of 0.5 for rising bubbles vs. all bubbles using their definition of a rising bubble.…”
Section: Comparison With Counts For All Bubbles and Spikesmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We note that in the paper by Kartoon et al [5], they observe a ratio of 0.5 for rising bubbles vs. all bubbles using their definition of a rising bubble.…”
Section: Comparison With Counts For All Bubbles and Spikesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In related work, Kartoon et al [5] define a rising bubble in the Rayleigh-Taylor instability as one which is accelerating, while a decelerating bubble is considered to be sinking. However, for their analysis of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability, they use a velocity-based criterion as in the work of Gardner et al [3].…”
Section: Defining a Rising Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…al. [9] segment bubbles from a set of small simulations using a vertical velocity criterion. Their method is not fully described in their paper, making it difficult to assess its robustness.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%