2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep14088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional non-destructive soft-tissue visualization with X-ray staining micro-tomography

Abstract: Low inherent contrast in soft tissues has been limiting the use of X-ray absorption micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to access high-resolution structural information of animal organs. The staining agents used in micro-CT to improve the contrast fail in providing high-quality images of whole organs of animals due to diffusion problems of the staining agent into the sample. We demonstrate a staining protocol that incorporates a biochemical conditioning step prior to exposure to the staining agent that succee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, tissue discrimination (connective tissue or muscle fibers) is not easy at this resolution. Although both stains have been successfully used for micro‐CT studies (Metscher, ; Pauwels et al., ; Descamps et al., ; Silva et al., ), our results concur only partly with the literature. The distinct staining of the mostly collagenous body wall supports the assumed, but yet unproven binding preference of PTA for connective tissue (Metscher, ; Descamps et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Still, tissue discrimination (connective tissue or muscle fibers) is not easy at this resolution. Although both stains have been successfully used for micro‐CT studies (Metscher, ; Pauwels et al., ; Descamps et al., ; Silva et al., ), our results concur only partly with the literature. The distinct staining of the mostly collagenous body wall supports the assumed, but yet unproven binding preference of PTA for connective tissue (Metscher, ; Descamps et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Two types of dimensional quantification are possible: two dimensional in terms of perimeter, diameter and area, and three dimensional in terms of volume and surface (29). Moreover, as described in the consensus on bone histomorphometry (30) and extensively discussed in the accompanying BMAS nomenclature position paper, BMA parameters should be presented in relation to a reference region (31).…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological slicing and histomorphometry remain the gold standard for the ex vivo evaluation and characterization of biological tissues in general, and BMAT in particular, by measuring adipocyte cell size and cell number. However, histological assessment (sectioning, staining, imaging, and analysis) remains a challenging, time-consuming, and often costly technique (29). Moreover, spatial patterns as well as the spatial inter-relationship between different tissues within one sample (for example BMAT in relation to bone and vasculature) can be inaccurate or impossible.…”
Section: Ex Vivo Whole-bone Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the high spatial resolution provided by X-ray micro-radiography and micro-CT, visualisation of soft tissue remains a challenging task due to the very low intrinsic attenuation contrast between the investigated structures. Consequently, for imaging of soft tissue with X-rays the application of a high-Z contrast agent is usually necessary 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 . To obtain a specific affinity of dedicated contrast agents to various tissue structures, a proper sample preparation protocol must be then followed.…”
Section: Virtual Histology By Means Of X-ray Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%