2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0081094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional non-hydrostatic model for dam-break flows

Abstract: A three-dimensional (3D) non-hydrostatic model is presented for the simulation of dam-break flows. The model solves the Reynoldsaveraged Navier-Stokes equations using the projection method. 3D computational grids are constructed from a two-dimensional horizontal unstructured mesh by adding horizontal layers in the vertical direction. Based on the horizontal unstructured grid system, horizontal advection terms are discretized by a momentum conservative scheme. The proposed model is validated with several physic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work must be viewed as an embryonic step so as to improve flood forecasting in the future. Additionally, the present results offer benchmark data for future numerical investigations given the increased focus on modeling and simulating dam-break problems 61,[81][82][83][84][85][86] over obstructions and vegetated bed scenarios. [87][88][89][90] The need to move beyond wall friction representation for energy losses is recognized in large scale models but alternatives remain in short supply.…”
Section: Conclusion and Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This work must be viewed as an embryonic step so as to improve flood forecasting in the future. Additionally, the present results offer benchmark data for future numerical investigations given the increased focus on modeling and simulating dam-break problems 61,[81][82][83][84][85][86] over obstructions and vegetated bed scenarios. [87][88][89][90] The need to move beyond wall friction representation for energy losses is recognized in large scale models but alternatives remain in short supply.…”
Section: Conclusion and Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In some cases, 3D LES models were successfully used to simulate the interaction of buoyancy driven flows with isolated and series of obstacles (Constantinescu, 2014; Gonzalez‐Juez et al., 2010; La Forgia et al., 2018; Tokyay et al., 2011, 2012, 2014; Tokyay & Constantinescu, 2015). A main challenge when applying such models to dam‐break flows is that the dynamics of the interface between the wave fluid and the air needs to be solved using a separate mode (Ai et al., 2022). One of the most used techniques for tracking the free surface in dam‐break applications is the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method (Biscarini et al., 2010; Munoz & Constantinescu, 2020; Marsooli & Wu, 2014; Ozmen‐Cagatay & Kocaman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%