2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2013.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three dimensional numerical rock damage analysis under blasting load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When static compressive stress was perpendicular to the propagation direction, the propagation was then repressed. Considering the influence of initial stress field in deep rock mass on rock failure mechanism, Yilmaz et al [12] used the numerical simulation method to investigate the influencing laws of anisotropic initial static stress field on blasting effect and destruction area. In engineering practices, Kwon et al [13] pointed out in the blasting construction of deep-buried tunnel the importance of understanding and evaluating the influence of deep initial stress field on blasting excavation behavior.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When static compressive stress was perpendicular to the propagation direction, the propagation was then repressed. Considering the influence of initial stress field in deep rock mass on rock failure mechanism, Yilmaz et al [12] used the numerical simulation method to investigate the influencing laws of anisotropic initial static stress field on blasting effect and destruction area. In engineering practices, Kwon et al [13] pointed out in the blasting construction of deep-buried tunnel the importance of understanding and evaluating the influence of deep initial stress field on blasting excavation behavior.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the relevant literature [25][26][27][28], the damage degree D of the similar uranium samples for the experiment was calculated using the following equation: By analyzing the curve of sample 1 and sample 2 in the above images, we can see that the fitting curves of sample 1 (0.07602 Bq·m −2 ·s −1 , 0.04523 Bq·m −2 ·s −1 ) and sample 2 (0.07650 Bq·m −2 ·s −1 , 0.04749 Bq·m −2 ·s −1 ) converge in the 20 Hz test group under the single-sided and double-sided testing conditions. The radon exhalation rate of sample 1 was larger than that of sample 2 with the increase in the vibration frequency.…”
Section: Damage Degree and Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the relevant literature [25][26][27][28], the damage degree D of the similar uranium samples for the experiment was calculated using the following equation:…”
Section: Damage Degree and Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy release rate is the average value of the 5 excavation steps. Table 2 Radius of crushed area and cracked area around blast holes (Hustrulid, 1999;Iverson et al, 2010;Dai, 2013;Yilmaz and Unlu, 2013;Zhang, 2000;Xu et al, 2002;Xia, 2006 …”
Section: Energy Release Rate (Err) and Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%