2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional numerical simulations of multi-pass equal-channel angular pressing by a variation difference method and comparison with experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smolyakov et al [9] proposed a variation-difference method for solving continuum mechanics equations to simulate the ECAP process and studied the effect of processing parameters on the stress and strain distribution over the cross-section of ECAP samples. Korshunov et al [10] investigated the annealed commercial pure titanium processed by four ECAP passes at 450°C via route B C , in which the repeated rotation angle around the longitudinal billet axis before reinsertion in the die was 90°, and found that the anisotropy after all the ECAP passes of processing is similar at both room temperature and elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smolyakov et al [9] proposed a variation-difference method for solving continuum mechanics equations to simulate the ECAP process and studied the effect of processing parameters on the stress and strain distribution over the cross-section of ECAP samples. Korshunov et al [10] investigated the annealed commercial pure titanium processed by four ECAP passes at 450°C via route B C , in which the repeated rotation angle around the longitudinal billet axis before reinsertion in the die was 90°, and found that the anisotropy after all the ECAP passes of processing is similar at both room temperature and elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(b)), it is possible to estimate the coef cient of friction during ECAE for copper as μ = 0.021. This value has a percentage error of 5% in relation to the experimental value of 0.02 estimated by Smolyakov et al 31) The method of this study was also applied to pure aluminum. Contrary to the case already discussed, the graphics for the pure aluminum case are not presented, to maintain the conciseness of this work.…”
Section: Determination Of the Coef Cient Of Friction In Ecaementioning
confidence: 52%
“…This issue can be critical for the components fabricated of the materials with lower crystal symmetry (such as Ti having the HCP lattice). Note that multi-scale computational approaches [ 23 , 35 , 36 ] developed to describe nanostructuring processes of Ti materials by ECAP demonstrated that macroscale simulation coupled with polycrystal models provided better description of its deformation behavior. They also allowed to take into consideration the texture effects important to account for the anisotropic properties [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%