2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional phase field modelling of the austenite-to-ferrite transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the resulting geometrical differences between the present model and phase-field simulation are small as ferrite grains also grow more or less spherically in the phase-field simulations when f a < 0.3. [42] Although a considerable difference is observed in the transformation kinetics for these two models, the average grain size d s and the standard deviation r p of the grain size distribution, show a comparable evolution as a function of f a . The value of d s increases nearly at the same speed for both models in the intermediate transformation stage (0.2 < f a < 0.6).…”
Section: A Comparison Between the Present Model And The Phase-field mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the resulting geometrical differences between the present model and phase-field simulation are small as ferrite grains also grow more or less spherically in the phase-field simulations when f a < 0.3. [42] Although a considerable difference is observed in the transformation kinetics for these two models, the average grain size d s and the standard deviation r p of the grain size distribution, show a comparable evolution as a function of f a . The value of d s increases nearly at the same speed for both models in the intermediate transformation stage (0.2 < f a < 0.6).…”
Section: A Comparison Between the Present Model And The Phase-field mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The present model is employed to simulate the ferrite transformation in an Fe-0.10C-0.49Mn (wt pct) steel during continuous cooling. The steel composition and transformation conditions were chosen equal to those in a previous computational study using a 3D phase-field model [20,42] which used the MICRESS (MICrostructure Evolution Simulation Software) code developed by Steinbach and coworkers. [43,44] The A 3 and A 1 À temperature of this steel are calculated to be 1116 K and 984 K (843°C and 711°C), respectively.…”
Section: Computational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M0 was found to depend on the cooling rate in order to describe experimental CCT data. Mecozzi et al 9) and Militzer et al 10) have used phase field modelling to simulate the austenite-to-ferrite transformation in Fe-0.1 mass% C-0.49 mass% Mn. Also, their analysis revealed an apparent cooling rate dependence of M0.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) describes the phenomenological thermodynamic driving force of the transformation. The magnitude of the driving force ΔG i j is given by ΔG αγ = ΔS ΔT at the α/γ interface, where ΔS and ΔT are the entropy difference between the α and γ phases and the undercooling, respectively (28) . The mobility of the phase field M…”
Section: Multiphase Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%