2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization for High-Resolution Mesoscale Simulations

Abstract: Wind energy applications including wind resource assessment, wind power forecasting, and wind plant optimization require high-resolution mesoscale simulations. High resolution mesoscale simulations are essential for accurate characterization of atmospheric flows over heterogeneous land use and complex terrain. Under such conditions, the assumption of grid-cell homogeneity, used in one-dimensional planetary boundary layer (1D PBL) parameterizations, breaks down. However, in most numerical weather prediction (NW… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During night-time the simulation maintains the heat flux close to zero, mostly positive, whereas in observations the median heat flux is negative, with values around −0.02 K m s −1 . During daytime the magnitude of F H is noticeably underestimated, and extreme positive values are never reached, a similar behaviour than observed by [2]. Greater values of F H are given by LES during IOP daytime central hours in comparison to non-IOP days.…”
Section: Model Performance: Turbulent Quantitiessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During night-time the simulation maintains the heat flux close to zero, mostly positive, whereas in observations the median heat flux is negative, with values around −0.02 K m s −1 . During daytime the magnitude of F H is noticeably underestimated, and extreme positive values are never reached, a similar behaviour than observed by [2]. Greater values of F H are given by LES during IOP daytime central hours in comparison to non-IOP days.…”
Section: Model Performance: Turbulent Quantitiessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this approach, the equations of the flow field are resolved using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) technique where turbulent motions are fully parametrised [1]. Instead, if the horizontal cell grid size decreases to a few km or tens or hundreds of metres, the assumption of horizontal homogeneity is not valid and the effect of horizontal gradients of turbulent stresses and fluxes should be included [2]. Turbulence is explicitly resolved using the large eddy simulation (LES) approximation, where the large eddies are resolved and the small eddies are modelled in a sub-grid scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WRF model's applicability over steep terrain, a known issue when downscaling due to topographic features being better resolved, is likewise being extended, using both higher-order numerical methods (Arthur et al, 2021) as well as immersed boundary methods (Lundquist et al, 2012;Arthur et al, 2018). These methods have likewise not been adequately evaluated in relation to wind energy relevant flow information.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the growing use of WRF at subkilometer scales across a broad user group, the need for a robust gray-zone modeling solution is urgent to ensure that research and technology decisions are based on reliable results. This modeling solution could also take the form of an adaptation of three-dimensional isotropic turbulence schemes [25,38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%