2006
DOI: 10.1021/la0613225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Pore Structure of Chromatographic Adsorbents from Electron Tomography

Abstract: The pore structure of chromatographic adsorbents directly influences macromolecular partitioning and transport in chromatography. Quantitative structural characterization of chromatographic media has generally been performed in terms of the mean pore size or, at best, the pore size distribution (PSD), but more detailed information on, e.g., connectivity has been lacking. We have applied electron tomography, a 3D TEM technique that views a sample from multiple perspectives and allows reconstruction of the volum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of sources can lead to the observed heterogeneity of protein adsorption, including intrinsic variance of the adsorbate molecule population due to differences in post-translational modifications, translational inaccuracy, and post-synthesis modifications such as deamidation and oxidation [6,16,17], inter-protein electrostatic repulsion and steric overlap [6,8], and irregularities in the adsorbent surface [18,19]. Because adsorption heterogeneity is observed even with uniform adsorbate populations and at very low loadings [20], it is likely that inherent heterogeneity of the adsorbent surface commonly plays the larger role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of sources can lead to the observed heterogeneity of protein adsorption, including intrinsic variance of the adsorbate molecule population due to differences in post-translational modifications, translational inaccuracy, and post-synthesis modifications such as deamidation and oxidation [6,16,17], inter-protein electrostatic repulsion and steric overlap [6,8], and irregularities in the adsorbent surface [18,19]. Because adsorption heterogeneity is observed even with uniform adsorbate populations and at very low loadings [20], it is likely that inherent heterogeneity of the adsorbent surface commonly plays the larger role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since uniformity of pore size is difficult to achieve, pore occlusion is also a possibility if the pore size is too small. A suggested optimum [14] is a pore size of order ten times the adsorbate size, although additional characteristics of the different adsorbent morphologies, including the porosity and the pore connectivity, are important considerations not discussed in detail in this simplistic analysis [15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topography is generally defined by the base matrix [12], leading to pronounced differences between such cases as the fibrous structure of agarose and the more extended sphere-like surface of polymethacrylates [15,16]. However, introduction of the functional ligands can alter the local topography and hence the adsorbate-adsorbent interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was implemented by eroding the pore volume with a structuring element equivalent to the probe of finite size [50–52]. An example application is in Figure 2, which shows a two-dimensional cross-section of a monolith sample that has been eroded by a three-dimensional spherical probe with a diameter of 5 voxels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%