2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03370-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific plates for the treatment of acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral plate disruption

Abstract: Background: Complicated acetabular fractures comprise the most challenging field for orthopedists. The purpose of this study was to develop three-dimensional printed patient-specific (3DPPS) Ti-6Al-4 V plates to treat complicated acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral plate (QLP) disruption and to evaluate their efficacy. Methods: Fifty patients with acetabular fractures involving QLP disruption were selected between January 2016 and June 2017. Patients were divided into a control group (Group A, 35 pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
9

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
43
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…These reported residual errors are comparable with those we found in our study (TTE = 3.1 mm, TRE = 8.3°). Titanium PSPs have been 3D printed for a multitude of clinical applications, including reconstructive surgery of the skull [34], orbital floor [35], mandibula [36], maxilla [37], sternum [38], acetabulum [39], radius and ulna shaft [25], and distal radius [16,24,25]. Comparing the positioning results in applicable studies is often difficult since different evaluation parameters and dimensions are used to quantify the residual positioning error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reported residual errors are comparable with those we found in our study (TTE = 3.1 mm, TRE = 8.3°). Titanium PSPs have been 3D printed for a multitude of clinical applications, including reconstructive surgery of the skull [34], orbital floor [35], mandibula [36], maxilla [37], sternum [38], acetabulum [39], radius and ulna shaft [25], and distal radius [16,24,25]. Comparing the positioning results in applicable studies is often difficult since different evaluation parameters and dimensions are used to quantify the residual positioning error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And design the optimal reduction sequence and further provide a reference for the selection and measurement of the plate. Many scholars have advocated the application of virtual and 3D printing technology in the treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture [ 26 , 27 ]. However, it should be noted that the basis of computer assisted surgery is the 3D model of acetabular fracture, either through virtual technology or 1:1 printed 3D fracture model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three randomised controlled trials [38,43,44], one prospective cohort study [40], ten case control studies [30][31][32]34,35,41,42,[45][46][47], and five case series [29,33,36,37] were included. The methodological quality of the papers varied from low (Table 3) to good (Table 4).…”
Section: Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine of these full-text articles were excluded due to the following reasons: foreign language article on 3D printing and pre-contouring the implant (N = 1); case reports (N = 2); descriptive study (N = 1); biomechanical study (N = 1); conference abstract (N = 1); outcome measurements unclear (N = 3). In total, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review (Figure 1) [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. The included studies enrolled a total of 753 patients (median sample size 27; range 10-146).…”
Section: Search and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%