2011
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional quadrature array coil elements for improved parallel magnetic resonance imaging performance at 1.5 Tesla

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In this study, a special concept of 3D quadrature array coil elements is presented. It allows for doubling the number of phased-array coil elements over a localized region of interest (ROI) without the necessity of reducing the sizes of the elements below optimal dimensions and thus losing performance due to domination of the noise of the elements. In this study, a 3D quadrature array coil element is formed of a planar coil element in combination with a perpendicular orientated, geometrically decouple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The copper strip coils reach a higher SNR because their conductor ohmic losses are lower, while reaching a maximum SNR with larger height because the 9.5 mm copper strip width decreases the distance between the phantom and current on the coil; the effective height (distance between inner conductor edges where much of the current actually flows) of the coil is also smaller. This behavior contrasts with that in Reference , where SNR increases exponentially with decreasing coil height because coil losses are neglected.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The copper strip coils reach a higher SNR because their conductor ohmic losses are lower, while reaching a maximum SNR with larger height because the 9.5 mm copper strip width decreases the distance between the phantom and current on the coil; the effective height (distance between inner conductor edges where much of the current actually flows) of the coil is also smaller. This behavior contrasts with that in Reference , where SNR increases exponentially with decreasing coil height because coil losses are neglected.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Upright coils are therefore a natural choice in high density arrays, even though they require some clearance and mechanical support above the surface. We have extended previous work by including the effects of noise from ohmic losses in the coil and tuning capacitors, leading to an optimal upright coil height that is approximately equal to one‐half the length (Fig. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation