2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional reconstruction of CME-driven shock–streamer interaction from radio and EUV observations: a different take on the diagnostics of coronal magnetic fields

Abstract: On 2014 October 30, a band-splitted type ii radio burst associated with a coronal mass ejection (CME) observed by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on board the Solar Dynamic Observatory (SDO) occurred over the southeast limb of the Sun. The fast expansion in all directions of the plasma front acted as a piston and drove a spherical fast shock ahead of it, whose outward progression was traced by simultaneous images obtained with the Nançay Radioheliograph (NRH). The geometry of the CME/shock event was rec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic spectrum ( Figure 2) of this event shows a complex Type II radio burst, mostly observed as harmonic emission, starting at about 13:08 UT and splitting into several subbands. The primary-band splitting has features suggesting shock/streamer interactions (see Mancuso et al, 2019). The further splitting of the upper-harmonic band (visible in the time interval between 13:08.5 UT and 13:08.7 UT) is most probably originating from simultaneous radio emission occurring in the upstream (ahead) and downstream (behind) region of the shock front (e.g.…”
Section: Instruments and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The dynamic spectrum ( Figure 2) of this event shows a complex Type II radio burst, mostly observed as harmonic emission, starting at about 13:08 UT and splitting into several subbands. The primary-band splitting has features suggesting shock/streamer interactions (see Mancuso et al, 2019). The further splitting of the upper-harmonic band (visible in the time interval between 13:08.5 UT and 13:08.7 UT) is most probably originating from simultaneous radio emission occurring in the upstream (ahead) and downstream (behind) region of the shock front (e.g.…”
Section: Instruments and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Type II radio sources were also imaged by the Nançay radioheliograph (NRH: Kerdraon and Delouis, 1997). The CME-driven shock was modeled by Mancuso et al (2019) as a spherical expanding/translating surface assuming that the primary band-splitted Type II radio burst was emitted at the intersection of the shock surface with adjacent low-Alfvén-speed coronal streamers as in the scenario proposed by Mancuso and Raymond (2004). For further details on the instruments and the analysis of the radio data related to this event, please refer to Mancuso et al (2019).…”
Section: Instruments and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Techniques to analyze solar eruptions in the proximity of active regions have been developed to obtain magnetic field strength in the low to middle corona (Gopalswamy et al, 2012;Mancuso & Garzelli, 2013a;Mancuso et al, 2003Mancuso et al, , 2019. Solar outburst radio analysis was derived from a method developed for analysis of the bow shock of the terrestrial magnetosphere, applied in a novel manner to the case of a CME emerging into a background coronal field (Mancuso et al, 2019). The technique provided important information in the heliocentric radial distance range 1.2-1.5 R ⊙ (Gopalswamy et al, 2012) using SDO imaging of CME ejections and the associated Type II radio bursts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%