Seismic geomorphology, the extraction of geomorphic insights using predominantly three-dimensional seismic data, is a rapidly evolving discipline that facilitates the study of the subsurface using plan view images. A variety of analytical techniques is employed to image and visualize depositional elements and other geologically significant features. This volume presents key technical papers presented at a recent research conference -the Seismic Geomorphology Conference (10-11 February 2005), co-convened by the Society for Sedimentary Geology and The Geological Society (London). These papers cover a broad range of topics, from detailed depositional element analysis to big picture regional issues, from lithology prediction to diagenetic modification of the stratigraphic section. This discipline is only in its early stages of development and will henceforth expand rapidly in response to the growing availability to researchers of highquality three-dimensional seismic data.The derivation of stratigraphic insights from seismic data has its origins in the early 1970s with the advent of improved quality two-dimensional (2D) seismic data. The assumption that seismic amplitude reflections approximate geological time lines was fundamental to the development of seismic stratigraphy . The discipline of seismic stratigraphy traces its roots to the landmark publication of AAPG Memoir 26, which summarized the work of Peter Vail and his colleagues at Exxon Production Research Company . Discrete seismic reflection packages, or depositional sequences, were defined by discontinuities shown in seismic data by the downlap, onlap, truncation or toplap of seismic reflections . Such seismic discontinuities were interpreted to represent stratigraphic discontinuities and unconformities. Inferences with regard to lithologies were based upon internal reflection character such as reflection amplitude and continuity. These 2D-based interpretations were then mapped and the spatial distribution of depositional systems with associated lithological predictions subsequently interpreted.Seismic reflection technology underwent significant advances in the 1980s, making these data less expensive to acquire and hence more widely available. Three-dimensional (3D) seismic reflection data comprised acquisition of closely spaced 2D seismic lines with high precision navigation, which, when computationally manipulated, yielded true 3D coverage in X-Y-Z space. At first, such data were interpreted as a succession of parallel 2D seismic sections. Techniques included printing the lines on translucent vellum and interpreting each section while partially seeing the immediately adjacent section through the vellum. This approach made interpretation easier from the perspective of mapping horizons but did not truly take advantage of the 'third-dimension' inherent to the 3D volume. In essence this approach resulted in little more than a tightly spaced 2D seismic analysis. By the mid to late 1980s, computerbased display and visualization of 3D data began to ta...