2022
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Semantic Segmentation of Diabetic Retinopathy Lesions and Grading Using Transfer Learning

Abstract: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a drastic disease. DR embarks on vision impairment when it is left undetected. In this article, learning-based techniques are presented for the segmentation and classification of DR lesions. The pre-trained Xception model is utilized for deep feature extraction in the segmentation phase. The extracted features are fed to Deeplabv3 for semantic segmentation. For the training of the segmentation model, an experiment is performed for the selection of the optimal hyperparameters that p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of proposed LBACS-LSTM with the existing approaches such as three-dimensional semantic model ( Jebaseeli et al, 2019 ), KNN ( Rachapudi et al, 2023 ), Computer-aided method ( Shaukat et al, 2022 ), CTSA-SAE ( Dayana and Emmanuel, 2022a ; Dayana and Emmanuel, 2022b ), DS-KL ( Mondal et al, 2023 ), ESOA optimized hybrid RCNN-BiGRU ( Alajlan and Razaque, 2023 ) and Adaptive CNN ( Math and Fatima, 2021 ) are described in this section. Table 10 presents the comparative analysis for IDRiD dataset and Table 11 depicts the comparative analysis of DIARETDB 1 dataset.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison of proposed LBACS-LSTM with the existing approaches such as three-dimensional semantic model ( Jebaseeli et al, 2019 ), KNN ( Rachapudi et al, 2023 ), Computer-aided method ( Shaukat et al, 2022 ), CTSA-SAE ( Dayana and Emmanuel, 2022a ; Dayana and Emmanuel, 2022b ), DS-KL ( Mondal et al, 2023 ), ESOA optimized hybrid RCNN-BiGRU ( Alajlan and Razaque, 2023 ) and Adaptive CNN ( Math and Fatima, 2021 ) are described in this section. Table 10 presents the comparative analysis for IDRiD dataset and Table 11 depicts the comparative analysis of DIARETDB 1 dataset.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from Table 10 and Table 11 show that the proposed LBACS-LSTM achieves better performance in overall metrics when compared with the existing three-dimensional semantic models ( Jebaseeli et al, 2019 ), KNN ( Rachapudi et al, 2023 ), Computer-aided method ( Shaukat et al, 2022 ), CTSA-SAE ( Dayana and Emmanuel, 2022b ), DS-KL ( Mondal et al, 2023 ) and ESOA optimized hybrid RCNN-BiGRU ( Alajlan and Razaque, 2023 ) and Adaptive CNN ( Math and Fatima, 2021 ). The accuracy of the proposed method for the IDRiD dataset is 99.43% and 97.39% for the DIARETDB 1 dataset.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Learning-based methods for segmenting and categorizing DR lesions are provided in [15]. Deep feature extraction is carried out during the segmentation level utilizing the trained Xception system.…”
Section: Literture Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification is the bottommost step in which each object accredits a label, in either a supervised or unsupervised ML technique (Bondi et al, 2017 ). Deep learning (DL) (Shaukat et al, 2022 ) is a subtype of machine learning that falls under the umbrella of artificial intelligence, but DL is way more vigorous and flexible in comparison with ML (Fabrizio et al, 2021 ). Techniques such as shallow CNN (Marwa et al, 2023 ), DNN (Hazarika et al, 2023 ), MultiAz-Net (Ismail et al, 2023 ), hybridized DL method (Hashmi, 2024 ), and RVFL (Goel et al, 2023 ) have been used in recent years, but these techniques yield low accuracy as compared to our proposed model (Shamrat et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%