1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)37597-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional structure of the ribonuclease T1 2'-GMP complex at 1.9-A resolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some theoretical studies predict that the ribose ring is extremely flexible and that the differences in energy between different ribose conformations are very small (Levitt & Warshel, 1978;Olson, 1982;Olson & Sussman, 1982), while others predict that the C2'-endo and C3'-endo conformations are much lower energy than other conformers (Murray-Rust & Motherwell, 1978;de Leeuw et al, 1980). Further support for the reasonableness of the calculated structures, however, is that their conformations are similar to those observed in different crystal structures of microbial ribonucleases complexed with nucleotides (Heinemann & Saenger, 1982;Arni et al, 1988;Koepke et al, 1989;Lenz et al, 1991b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some theoretical studies predict that the ribose ring is extremely flexible and that the differences in energy between different ribose conformations are very small (Levitt & Warshel, 1978;Olson, 1982;Olson & Sussman, 1982), while others predict that the C2'-endo and C3'-endo conformations are much lower energy than other conformers (Murray-Rust & Motherwell, 1978;de Leeuw et al, 1980). Further support for the reasonableness of the calculated structures, however, is that their conformations are similar to those observed in different crystal structures of microbial ribonucleases complexed with nucleotides (Heinemann & Saenger, 1982;Arni et al, 1988;Koepke et al, 1989;Lenz et al, 1991b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The crystal structure of RNase T 1 containing guanosine monophosphate in the binding site shows that the nucleobase adopts the syn conformation with various H-bonding contacts directing the corresponding recognition (Figure , G model built from information in refs and ). Three reasons led us to rationalize that 8-oxoG could be a substrate for RNase T 1 : (1) that 8-oxoG is known to exist in the syn conformation preferentially, (2) that the H-bonding sites present in G are still part of those in 8-oxoG, and (3) that the N1 and O6 positions, known to interact with the enzyme, are not modified in the 8-oxoG oxidative lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the main difference at the vault caps, there is also a subtle change in the weak internal density of the intact and RNase-treated vault recon-structions+ As previously reported, density above the background noise level can be seen in the central slice of the intact vault reconstruction (Fig+ 6A)+ The equivalent central slice of the RNase-treated vault reconstruction reveals less density in the vault cavity (Fig+ 6B)+ Admittedly, different symmetries, C8 versus D8, were imposed on these two reconstruc-tions+ However, the C8 intact vault reconstruction has similar internal weak density in both halves of the vault, so the contents would probably not be too different with imposed D8 symmetry+ The cryo-EM particle images of the RNase-treated vaults show that there is still significant density trapped within the vault (Fig+ 2); therefore RNase treatment has not completely degraded the contents, but it might have partially degraded them+ Comparison of the intact and RNase-treated vault reconstructions raises the possibility that some portion of the contents of the intact vault is RNA, either vRNA or another RNA species+ The molecular dimensions observed in the crystal structure of RNase T1 (Arni et al+, 1988) suggest that this enzyme might fit through the small holes observed in the reconstruction (;20 ϫ 40 Å)+ Perhaps the smaller RNase A is able to pass through more easily+ The size of the holes in the vault reconstruction is dependent on the isosurface value chosen, and at higher isosurface values, the holes appear larger+ We have set the isosurface value of the RNase-treated reconstruction so that the volume corresponds with the average STEM mass measurement of the vault minus 5% for the vRNA+ Also, we suspect that the caps do not follow perfect dihedral eightfold symmetry, and portions of the true cap structure may be blurred in the reconstruction+ In support of this idea, we note that only the flat ends of the caps show strong density in the reconstruction, and the side walls of the caps appear weak as if they have been inappropriately averaged (Fig+ 6B)+ So perhaps there are larger openings in the caps that are not observed in the symmetrized reconstruction, but that would allow both types of RNase molecules to enter the vault cavity+ FIGURE 5. Difference imaging between the RNase-treated and intact vault reconstructions to reveal the location of the vRNA+ The difference density above the noise level is shown in red, overlaid on two views of the intact vault reconstruction that has been cropped in half+ Note that the difference density is located at the ends of the vault caps+ The scale bar corresponds to 250 Å+ FIGURE 6.…”
Section: Internal Contents Of the Vaultmentioning
confidence: 99%