2002
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional structure of the type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor at 24 A resolution

Abstract: We report here the ®rst three-dimensional structure of the type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP 3 R). From cryo-electron microscopic images of puri®ed receptors embedded in vitreous ice, a threedimensional structure was determined by use of standard single particle reconstruction techniques. The structure is strikingly different from that of the ryanodine receptor at similar resolution despite molecular similarities between these two calcium release channels. The 24 A Ê resolution structure of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
80
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
80
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This potential problem is accentuated if the signal-to-noise ratio is low, as frequently occurs in cryo-EM images, and no prior knowledge of the 3D structure exists. Our IP 3 R structure shows a level of detail consistent with the 3-nm resolution estimated, whereas less detail is observed by Jiang et al (33). Furthermore, our map has allowed us to assign specific functional domains, which are consistent with secondary structure predictions and biochemical studies, and show similarities to related cation channels (see below).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Structural Data On the Ip3rsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This potential problem is accentuated if the signal-to-noise ratio is low, as frequently occurs in cryo-EM images, and no prior knowledge of the 3D structure exists. Our IP 3 R structure shows a level of detail consistent with the 3-nm resolution estimated, whereas less detail is observed by Jiang et al (33). Furthermore, our map has allowed us to assign specific functional domains, which are consistent with secondary structure predictions and biochemical studies, and show similarities to related cation channels (see below).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Structural Data On the Ip3rsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…During the preparation of this manuscript, another 3D map of the type 1 IP 3 R was reported based on cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and single-particle image analysis at a reported resolution of 2.4 nm (33). The overall size (Ϸ18 ϫ 18 ϫ 17 nm) and shape of this 3D structure are broadly consistent with our results but there is little detailed agreement between the two studies.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Structural Data On the Ip3rsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Functional IP 3 Rs are tetrameric, assembled either from identical subunits or from mixtures of the three subtypes and their many splice variants Foskett et al 2007). Several structures of the entire IP 3 R1 have been published, each derived from single particle analysis of images from electron microscopy (Hamada and Mikoshiba 2002;Jiang et al 2002a;da Fonseca et al 2003;Hamada et al 2003;Serysheva et al 2003;Sato et al 2004). These studies confirm the tetrameric state of IP 3 R, but variability between the structures and their relatively low resolution ( 30 Å ) have, so far, limited any realistic interpretation of the structural basis of IP 3 R activation (Fig.…”
Section: Structural Determinants Of Ip 3 R Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this reconstruction was also performed using EMAN (without EMANЈs CTF correction) with some initial analysis in IMAGIC, it seems unlikely that this is a software problem but probably represents a fundamental difference in the raw data. The receptor purification strategy used in this study uses single-step chromatography over an immunoaffinity matrix with Triton X-100 while Jiang et al (7) used CHAPS. Additionally da Fonseca (8) used essentially the same strategy as Jiang et al (7) with the only major difference being the use of Triton X-100 and Surfact-Amps X-100.…”
Section: Biochemical Purity and Functional Integrity Of The Purifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the apparent discrepancies between the structures are a consequence of the different detergents. Additionally our protein isolation was performed at pH 7.4, whereas the other preparations (7,8) were made at alkaline pH. These pH changes may induce additional conformational transitions of the channel.…”
Section: Biochemical Purity and Functional Integrity Of The Purifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%