2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2012.720046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional surface reconstruction of tree canopy from lidar point clouds using a region-based level set method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been done with 2D k-means clustering in each slice and subsequent merging of clusters that overlap along the vertical direction [30] and by deriving the horizontal contours of the trees from a region-based level set method and constructing a 3D canopy surface by stacking the contours on top of each other [31]. Dividing the point cloud into slices is an intuitive approach and can be implemented in a computationally efficient way, but it does not make optimal use of the geometric information in the point cloud since it simplifies the data before delineating the tree crowns in the vertical direction.…”
Section: D Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been done with 2D k-means clustering in each slice and subsequent merging of clusters that overlap along the vertical direction [30] and by deriving the horizontal contours of the trees from a region-based level set method and constructing a 3D canopy surface by stacking the contours on top of each other [31]. Dividing the point cloud into slices is an intuitive approach and can be implemented in a computationally efficient way, but it does not make optimal use of the geometric information in the point cloud since it simplifies the data before delineating the tree crowns in the vertical direction.…”
Section: D Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delineated tree crowns in the top-most canopy layer may be used as initial values when delineating tree crowns and shrubs from the point cloud or the ALS returns assigned to the tree crowns may be excluded to enable analysis of the canopy structure below. Another common approach is to divide the point cloud into horizontal slices of a certain vertical thickness, analyze each slice separately to identify tree crowns in each slice, and aggregate the delineated tree crown slices to define three-dimensional tree crowns [30,31].…”
Section: D Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many 3D delineation methods proposed in the literature, they are not all adequately validated as important accuracy measures such as omission and commission errors, or errors are not reported [e.g. Gupta et al, 2010;Tang et al, 2013]. When an ITC delineation method fail to detect individual trees present, it leads to omission errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other 3D delineation methods first generated a preliminary watershed segmentation of the CHM to define tree segments and afterwards separated trees within each segment by normalized cut segmentation [Shi and Malik, 2000] on the ALS point cloud [Reitberger et al, 2009], or by a trough-finding algorithm on the ALS height histogram [Duncanson et al, 2014]. Some delineation methods first delineated tree crowns on the 2D horizontal projection images at different height levels, and then the 'tree' segments delineated from various layers were combined to form 3D tree crowns [Wang et al, 2008;Tang et al, 2013]. Some 3D methods are very particular in their approach [Li et al, 2012;Lähivaara et al, 2014;Lu et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dots and lines indicate the mean and standard deviation, respectively, within the area. Harvesting intensity 0 corresponds to the initial canopy 3D clustering followed by convex polytope reconstruction (Gupta et al 2010), stacking horizontal slices of the height values (Tang et al 2013), or voxel-based techniques (Schneider et al 2014; see also Koch et al 2014). All these methods involve certain parameters to be set by the operator, and the obtained results depend on these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%