SAE Technical Paper Series 1991
DOI: 10.4271/911390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Tracking with Misalignment Between Display and Control Axes

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted examining . three-dimensional pursuit tracking when operators of teleoperation simulations are faced with misalignment between the display and control frames of reference.Targets on the experimental displays moved irregularly in three dimensions and were tracked by subjects using either two 2-axis joysticks and a panelmounted perspective display or, in a separate experiment, a hand-mounted, 6 degree-of-freedom electromagnetic sensor and a head-mounted, virtual image, stereoscopic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently the spatial motion of a cursor or a physically controlled element with respect to input control device orientation has been examined. (Worringhan & Beringer 1989;Cunningham & Vardi, 1990;Ellis, Tyler, Kim & Stark, 1992;Macedo, Kaber, Endsley, Powanusorn, & Myung, 1998;Ellis & Adelstein, 2009;Abeele & Bock, 2001;Wickens, Keller & Small, 2010;Chintamani, Cao, Ellis, & Pandya, 2010). This situation is frequently encountered in teleoperation when the coordinate systems for motor control and visual feedback are misaligned, e.g., Smith & Smith, 1962;Smith, Henning & Li, 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently the spatial motion of a cursor or a physically controlled element with respect to input control device orientation has been examined. (Worringhan & Beringer 1989;Cunningham & Vardi, 1990;Ellis, Tyler, Kim & Stark, 1992;Macedo, Kaber, Endsley, Powanusorn, & Myung, 1998;Ellis & Adelstein, 2009;Abeele & Bock, 2001;Wickens, Keller & Small, 2010;Chintamani, Cao, Ellis, & Pandya, 2010). This situation is frequently encountered in teleoperation when the coordinate systems for motor control and visual feedback are misaligned, e.g., Smith & Smith, 1962;Smith, Henning & Li, 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the rotation angle is so large that the targeting error does not result in each incremental movement being closer to the target, the entire process will not converge and the target will never be reached. This situation would require a different targeting strategy to be used and could account for inferences that different mechanism could be needed for small versus large rotations (Abeele & Bock, 2001;Ellis et al, 1992). But the adoption of an alternative targeting technique, especially if it were perceived to be more difficult, would likely be resisted as participants might be expected to favor the easiest possible strategy.…”
Section: Movement Modelingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Under such conditions, users' bodyreferenced control movements produce motion on visual displays of the remote site that appears to be rotated with respect to the expected body-referenced direction. Of course, operators may learn to adapt to such misalignment (Krakhauer, Pine, Ghilardi, & Ghez, 2000), but these adaptations can be quite difficult if the rotations are greater than 90 • (Abeele & Bock, 2001;Ellis, Tyler, Kim, & Stark, 1992;Hinkley, Pausch, Proffitt, Patten, & Klassell, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For comparison, results from a related 2D placement task published previously are overlaid (Ellis & Adelstein, 2009). Also overlaid are results from a 3D tracking task done on a perspective display with display-control coordinate misalignments (Ellis, Tyler, Kim & Stark, 1992). These datasets show MEF similarity for the three response measures 3…”
Section: A Partial Theory Of the Mefmentioning
confidence: 99%