2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-017-1528-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Transient Electromagnetic Modeling Based on Fictitious Wave Domain Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 17), and it was normalized by the square of the single-turn receiving coil. The solution of the forward modeling solver agrees well with that in the study by Ji et al (2017) (Figure 5B). These examples serve as strong evidence for the accuracy and reliability of our forward modeling code.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 17), and it was normalized by the square of the single-turn receiving coil. The solution of the forward modeling solver agrees well with that in the study by Ji et al (2017) (Figure 5B). These examples serve as strong evidence for the accuracy and reliability of our forward modeling code.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Second, we take the RFLTEM as an example, and a loop source with dimensions of 10 m × 10 m can be decomposed into many EDs. A 3D conductive body (50 m × 50 m × 50 m) of 20 Ωm is embedded in a twolayer Earth model in Ji et al (2017) (Figure 5A). In the numerical simulation, the origin of the coordinate system is at the surface with the z-axis downward through the center of the abnormal body.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mittet (2018) used the least squares fitting method to calculate the IP response of sea water in the fictitious wave field [24]. Ji (2017) improved the emission source, applied the wave field transformation method to the ground transient electromagnetic simulation, and realized a three-dimensional transient electromagnetic numerical simulation including the air layer [25]. However, it did not consider the IP effect of the earth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%