15th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1977
DOI: 10.2514/6.1977-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer calculations for swept wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the co-ordinate system in which the solution is to be found, the means of representing the wing in this co-ordinate system, the governing boundary-layer equations, the means of specifying the initial and boundary conditions, the model chosen to represent the turbulent stresses present, and the numerical procedure used to generate the solutions. Numerous investigators' [5][6][7][8] ' using various combinations of approaches have tackled this problem with varying degrees of success. At Douglas, the work of Cebeci, Kaups and Ramsey (CKR) led to the development of a procedure for arbitrary wings' 51 which is unique in many aspects.…”
Section: Ckr Three-dimensional Boundary-layer Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include the co-ordinate system in which the solution is to be found, the means of representing the wing in this co-ordinate system, the governing boundary-layer equations, the means of specifying the initial and boundary conditions, the model chosen to represent the turbulent stresses present, and the numerical procedure used to generate the solutions. Numerous investigators' [5][6][7][8] ' using various combinations of approaches have tackled this problem with varying degrees of success. At Douglas, the work of Cebeci, Kaups and Ramsey (CKR) led to the development of a procedure for arbitrary wings' 51 which is unique in many aspects.…”
Section: Ckr Three-dimensional Boundary-layer Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for as many examples as are presented showing good agreement between experiment and essentially inviscid computational methods, one can be sure that there are at least as many other examples where the agreement is poor due to the presence of strong viscous effects. To attack this problem, numerous organisations have been pursuing the coupling of various three-dimensional boundary-layer methods with three-dimensional transonic flow analysis methods' [5][6][7][8] '. The effort at Douglas on this problem has focused primarily on the use of a new, improved version of the Cebeci-Kaups-Ramsey (CKR) three-dimensional finite-difference boundary-layer program in conjunction with a Douglas version of the Jameson-Caughey full-potential program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is also extendable to wing design when it is combined with a threedimensional boundary-layer code. 21 The shock-free wing design method presented here tends to reduce the maximum thickness of the original wing. For flows at high freestream Mach numbers or at high lift coefficients, the thickness reduction invoked in the design process may in certain cases be too large to be acceptable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%