Background
The high incidence of non-cardiac congenital anomalies in high-risk pregnancies is a major worldwide health problem. Congenital deformities represent 20–25% of perinatal deaths. The best non-invasive screening method for diagnosing congenital abnormalities is ultrasound. Four-dimensional ultrasound added additional diagnostic value to two-dimensional ultrasound in evaluating fetal prenatal conditions. Our study's goal was to compare the roles of two-dimensional and four-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of non-cardiac fetal congenital anomalies in high-risk pregnancies.
Results
Out of the 100 pregnant women who underwent examinations, all had high-risk pregnancies and were expected to give birth to babies with deformities, a total of 25 cases (or 25%) of fetal abnormalities were found. The two-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis's accuracy sensitivity, and specificity were 84%, 76%, and 86.67%, respectively, while they were 87%, 80%, and 89.33%, respectively, for four-dimensional ultrasound. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of two-dimensional ultrasound combined with four-dimensional ultrasound were significantly higher (94%, 88%, and 96%, respectively) than those of two-dimensional ultrasound or four-dimensional ultrasound alone. This study also analyzed the risk factors leading to fetal malformations. The results showed that consanguinity, increased maternal age, past history or family history of congenital anomalies, history of medication during pregnancy, and maternal diabetes were major risk factors statistically significant for congenital anomalies.
Conclusion
The diagnosis rate of fetal abnormalities can be significantly increased by combining two-dimensional ultrasound with four-dimensional ultrasound. Avoiding risk factors that raise the likelihood of fetal abnormalities should take priority for pregnant women with high risk factors. To lower the incidence of fetal abnormalities, prenatal screening and diagnosis should be standardized.
