2000
DOI: 10.1243/0957650001537813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional unsteady Navier—Stokes analysis of stator—rotor interaction in axial-flow turbines

Abstract: A three-dimensional full Navier-Stokes method is developed and applied to calculations of unsteady flows through multiple blade rows in axial-flow turbomachinery. The solver adopts the cellcentred finite volume discretization and the four-stage Runge-Kutta time-marching scheme. Unsteady calculations are effectively accelerated by using a time-consistent multi-grid technique, resulting in a speed-up by a factor of 10–20 with adequate temporal accuracy. The computational efficiency and validity of the present mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 For the spatial discretization of the equations, a second-order central difference type of spatial discretization was previously adopted in the solver for evaluating the fluxes at the cell boundary faces. 15,16 Recently, a pressure-advective flux split upwinding discretization, AUSM (Liou 17 ) has been implemented. The upwind scheme is shown to produce less numerically dissipative results in near-wall viscous flow regions, as desired.…”
Section: Baseline Flow Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 For the spatial discretization of the equations, a second-order central difference type of spatial discretization was previously adopted in the solver for evaluating the fluxes at the cell boundary faces. 15,16 Recently, a pressure-advective flux split upwinding discretization, AUSM (Liou 17 ) has been implemented. The upwind scheme is shown to produce less numerically dissipative results in near-wall viscous flow regions, as desired.…”
Section: Baseline Flow Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the validity of the solver, an appropriate combination of component validation and code-to-code comparisons has, therefore, been performed. The capability of the multi-row, multi-passage, baseline solver to predict the aerodynamic response to blade-row interaction and blade oscillation has been verified against experimental data in references [24] and [27], respectively. Furthermore, the single-passage methodology has been validated in an isolated row against a semi-analytical solution of Namba [28].…”
Section: Validation Of the Single Passage Solvermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Local instantaneous information is transferred directly across the interface by a second-order interpolation and correction method. 26 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%