Aim:The marginal and internal fit, fracture strength, and mode of failure of 3rd printed CAD/CAM provisional crowns were compared to those of direct provisional crowns. Subjects and Methods; Following tooth preparation guidelines upper right first premolar Farasco tooth. 3rd printed Polyphenylene sulfone (PPSU), milled CAD-CAM Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and ProtempTM4 manually fabricated were the materials tested (control group). The crowns were divided into three groups (n=20): Groups 1, 2, and 3: Each crown was examined for marginal and internal fit, fracture strength, and failure mode. In a universal test machine, the maximum force at fracture (Fmax) was measured, and the mode of failure was reported at 0.5 mm/min. ANOVA, chi-squared test, and Tukey's tests (p 0.05). Results: the average marginal gap of PEEK(Polyetheretherketone) CAD-CAM was less than the 3 rd printed PPSU (Polyphenylene sulfone) and direct fabrication Protemp™4, PPSU 80.64±8.34 µm, PEEK 60.64±9.54 µm, and Protemp4 120.64±32.34 µm. This indicated a statistically significant difference in the marginal gap distances between all groups (p<0.001). The average internal gap value for each group was: PPSU 155.32±20.56 µm, PEEK 123.45±16.11 µm, and Protemp™4 260.34±34.45 µm. There was a statistically significant difference in fracture strength between all classes. (p<0.001). Each group's average fracture strength was: PPSU 657.43±23.43 N, PEEK 870.45±18.87 N, and Protemp™4 427.34±25.43 N. Conclusion. CAD/CAM PEEK temporary crowns and the 3 rd printed PPSU material exhibited significantly higher fracture strength and less marginal and internal gap measurements than conventionally fabricated Protemp™ 4 resins after the aging regimen.