DOI: 10.33915/etd.2833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three essays on resources, institutions, and development across U.S. states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also a few unpublished papers using sub-national data. They include Caselli and Michaels (2009), which looks at the effect of oil resources in different regions of Brazil, and dissertation chapters by Sen (2010), Corey (2008), and Dunn (2008), which employ U.S. data measured at the state and (in the case of Sen) county level. Like James and Aadland (2011), these latter three studies analyze the United States as a whole and define resource abundance broadly, whereas we focus on Appalachia and coal in order to identify the mechanism sharply.…”
Section: Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a few unpublished papers using sub-national data. They include Caselli and Michaels (2009), which looks at the effect of oil resources in different regions of Brazil, and dissertation chapters by Sen (2010), Corey (2008), and Dunn (2008), which employ U.S. data measured at the state and (in the case of Sen) county level. Like James and Aadland (2011), these latter three studies analyze the United States as a whole and define resource abundance broadly, whereas we focus on Appalachia and coal in order to identify the mechanism sharply.…”
Section: Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a few unpublished papers using sub-national data. They include Caselli and Michaels (2009), which looks at the effect of oil resources in different regions of Brazil, and dissertation chapters by Sen (2010), Corey (2008), and Dunn (2008), which employ U.S. data measured at the state and (in the case of Sen) county level. Like James and Aadland (2011), these latter three studies analyze the United States as a whole and define resource abundance broadly, whereas we focus on Appalachia and coal in order to identify the mechanism sharply.…”
Section: Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include dissertation chapters by Sen (2010), Corey (2008), and Dunn 2008 Most recently, Caselli and Michaels (2013) looks at the effect of oil resources in different regions of Brazil, and finds that increased revenue to municipalities from oil windfalls do not translate into a significant increase in public good provision or the population's living standards.…”
Section: Resource Curse Studies Using Sub-national Datamentioning
confidence: 99%