1979
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.26.4.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three experiments using an algorithm for empathic responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite challenges concerning whether empathy can be taught (Carkhuff & Berenson, 1967;Davis, 1980;Hatcher et al, 1994;Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), empathy training typically attempts to teach two skills: understanding another's thoughts and feelings and communicating this understanding to a client (Truax & Carkhuff, 1967;Carkhuff, 1969). Researchers have studied a variety of techniques for teaching empathy, including verbal instruction (Shaffer & Hummel, 1979), role-playing (Guzzetta, 1976;Stone & Vance, 1976), videotape (Dalton & Sunblad, 1976;Eisenberg & Delaney, 1970), audiotape (Perry, 1975), written and taped patient session transcripts (Finke, 1990), communication skills training (Evans, Stanley, & Burrows, 1993), a Rogerian-based curriculum in peer facilitation training (Hatcher et al, 1994), peer mediation (Lane-Garon, 1998), and an empathy training game that focuses on competition and enjoyment to increase trainee motivation and interest (Barak et al, 1987). The lack of agreement on the definition of empathy and a reliable way to measure it has hindered the adoption of conclusions from this research about how best to train empathy (Evans et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite challenges concerning whether empathy can be taught (Carkhuff & Berenson, 1967;Davis, 1980;Hatcher et al, 1994;Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), empathy training typically attempts to teach two skills: understanding another's thoughts and feelings and communicating this understanding to a client (Truax & Carkhuff, 1967;Carkhuff, 1969). Researchers have studied a variety of techniques for teaching empathy, including verbal instruction (Shaffer & Hummel, 1979), role-playing (Guzzetta, 1976;Stone & Vance, 1976), videotape (Dalton & Sunblad, 1976;Eisenberg & Delaney, 1970), audiotape (Perry, 1975), written and taped patient session transcripts (Finke, 1990), communication skills training (Evans, Stanley, & Burrows, 1993), a Rogerian-based curriculum in peer facilitation training (Hatcher et al, 1994), peer mediation (Lane-Garon, 1998), and an empathy training game that focuses on competition and enjoyment to increase trainee motivation and interest (Barak et al, 1987). The lack of agreement on the definition of empathy and a reliable way to measure it has hindered the adoption of conclusions from this research about how best to train empathy (Evans et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features create the possibility of doing research with well-defined terms under controlled conditions. The development of CLIENT 1 has led to experiments that test procedures for directing novice counselors in responding empathically (Shaffer & Hummel, 1979). This use of a computer program as a client provides an exciting direction for counseling research by providing rigorously controlled experimental conditions.…”
Section: Counseling and Naturalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a better understanding of the logic and the cognitive processing effective counselors use in working with clients, it is hoped that more effective and efficient counseling and training strategies can be developed. Several studies have already been carried out in this regard, and initial algorithms for recognizing and responding to affect and for generating appropriate interpretations have been developed and are being used (e.g., Hummel, 1976;Shaffer & Hummel, 1979).…”
Section: Uses In Counselor Education and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%