Background: Esophageal cancer is considered a serious malignancy with respect to its prognosis and mortality rate. Cervical lymph node status is one of the keys to determining prognosis and treatment methods. However, published data vary regarding the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of ultrasound for detecting cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer.
Methods:The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies related to cervical lymph node metastasis, and 22 studies comprising 3,513 patients met our inclusion criteria. We used a bivariate meta-analysis following a random effects model to summarize the data. We also explored reasons for statistical heterogeneity using meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was assessed with a Deeks funnel plot.
Results:The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-0.98], and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 121.00 ). With cut-off values of 5 mm and >5 mm for cervical lymph node size, the sensitivities and specificities (95% confidence interval) for ultrasound detection of cervical lymph node metastasis were 84% (67-93%) and 93% (90-95%); and 94% (76-98%) and 98% (89-100%), respectively.
Conclusions:We show for the first time the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for predicting cervical lymph node-positive metastasis in esophageal cancer. Our analysis shows that ultrasonography may be an effective and reliable approach to detect cervical lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer. However, to accommodate heterogeneity, high-quality studies are needed to further verify the efficacy of ultrasound detection.
IntroductionEsophageal cancer is considered a serious malignancy with respect to its prognosis and mortality rate. An estimated 455,800 new cases of esophageal cancer and 400,200 esophageal cancer-related deaths occurred in 2012 worldwide (1). High rates of recurrence and metastasis cause high mortality among patients with esophageal cancer (2).Surgical resection has been well established as a part of multimodal treatment for esophageal cancer. The number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) removed is an independent predictor of survival in esophageal cancer after esophagectomy (3,4). Fortunately, the surgical dissection of cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) and three-field LNs contribute to a better prognosis and prolonged survival for patients with esophageal cancer (5-7). One of the most important methods to identify whether three-field lymphadenectomy should be performed is an examination of CLN status.Ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are used clinically to detect regional LNs. Nevertheless, the value of CT and FDG-PET scanning is limited (8), and there is an associated financial burden and risk of high exposure to radiation. Comparatively sp...