“…Cu II ions usually adopt either a square planar, square pyramidal, or axially elongated octahedral geometries and are bridged by two azido ions in the µ-1,1 (end-on, EO) [6][7][8][9] or µ-1,3 (end-to-end, EE) [4a,4b,10,11] modes (Scheme 1). The bridge may adopt the "symmetric" equatorial-equatorial (eq-eq) fashion (i.e., occupy the equatorial positions of both Cu ions; Scheme 1c), with two comparable short Cu-N bonds (1.97-2.14 Å), [6,7,10] or the asymmetric equatorial-axial (eq-ax) fashion (i.e., occupy the equatorial position of one Cu ion but the axial position of the other metal ion; Scheme 1d) with short (1.97-2.08 Å, equatorial) and long (2.19-2.85 Å, axial) Cu-N bonds. [8,9,11] It is now accepted that the nature and magnitude of the magnetic exchange are not only dependent upon the bridging mode (EO or EE), but also strongly influenced by the arrangement (eq-eq or eq-ax) of the azido bridge between the metal ions.…”