2022
DOI: 10.3390/jof8060577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three New Species of Microdochium (Sordariomycetes, Amphisphaeriales) on Miscanthus sinensis and Phragmites australis from Hainan, China

Abstract: Species in Microdochium, potential agents of biocontrol, have often been reported as plant pathogens, occasionally as endophytes and fungicolous fungi. Combining multiple molecular markers (ITS rDNA, LSU rDNA, TUB2 and RPB2) with morphological characteristics, this study proposes three new species in the genus Microdochium represented by seven strains from the plant hosts Miscanthus sinensis and Phragmites australis in Hainan Island, China. These three species, Microdochium miscanthi sp. Nov., M. sinense sp. N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydnotrya is distributed across the northern hemisphere including Asian, European, and North American countries [ 102 ]. Microdochium species are commonly known as plant pathogens and saprophytes isolated from diseased plant hosts such as grasses and cereals [ 103 ]. The genus is characterized by its spherical and erumpent stromata and solitary transparent spindle-shaped to oval conidia [ 104 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydnotrya is distributed across the northern hemisphere including Asian, European, and North American countries [ 102 ]. Microdochium species are commonly known as plant pathogens and saprophytes isolated from diseased plant hosts such as grasses and cereals [ 103 ]. The genus is characterized by its spherical and erumpent stromata and solitary transparent spindle-shaped to oval conidia [ 104 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. nannuoshanense is distinguished from M. sinense (SAUCC 211097) by 4/535, 3/836, 16/909 and 4/717 characters in ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TUB2 sequences, respectively. Morphologically, M. nannuoshanense differs from M. sinense in conidia (7.0-12.0 × 2.5-4.0 µm vs. 11.5-19.34 × 2.8-5.4 µm) and in colony texture (creamy white to pale brown with regular margins vs. yellow-brown overall and fluffy at the edge on PDA) [21]. For details, see Table 3 Culture characteristics-Cultures incubated on PDA at 25 °C in darkness, reaching 68-73 mm diam., had a growth rate of 4.8-5.2 mm/day after 14 days, were creamy white to pale brown with regular margins, had moderate aerial mycelia, and the reverse was similar.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…M. nannuoshanense is distinguished from M. sinense (SAUCC 211097) by 4/535, 3/836, 16/909 and 4/717 characters in ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TUB2 sequences, respectively. Morphologically, M. nannuoshanense differs from M. sinense in conidia (7.0-12.0 × 2.5-4.0 µm vs. 11.5-19.34 × 2.8-5.4 µm) and in colony texture (creamy white to pale brown with regular margins vs. yellow-brown overall and fluffy at the edge on PDA) [21]. For details, see Table 3.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations