Three-Parameter Modification of the Peng-Robinson Equation of State To Improve Volumetric Predictions

Abstract

Three-Parameter Modification of the Peng-Robinson Equation of State To Peng-Robinson Equation of State To Improve Volumetric Predictions Summary. The Peneloux-Rauzy-Freze (PRF) method of improving volumetric predictions by introducing a third parameter into a two-parameter equation predictions by introducing a third parameter into a two-parameter equation of state (EOS) is applied to the Peng-Robinson EOS (PR-EOS). The modified PR-EOS is evaluated for application to hydrocarbon fluids. A method is PR-EOS is evaluated for application to hydrocarbon fluids. A method is developed for characterizing the third parameter for the heptanes-plus fractions. The usefulness of the modified PR-EOS in improving volumetric predictions is illustrated by applying the equation to several crude-oil predictions is illustrated by applying the equation to several crude-oil and gas-condensate systems from the literature. Introduction In recent years, two-parameter cubic EOS's--e.g., the PR-EOS and the Soave-Redlich-Kwong EOS (SRK-EOS)-have been commonly used by the petroleum industry for predicting the phase behavior and volumetric properties of hydrocarbon fluid mixtures. Once the heptane-plus fraction of the hydrocarbon fluid is properly characterized into a mixture of pseudocomponents, these equations predict the vapor/liquid equilibrium conditions with a reasonable accuracy. However, the volumetric estimates obtained through these two-parameter EOS's are not as accurate. In our experience with the application of the PR-EOS to reservoir fluids, we found that the error in the prediction of gas-phase z factors ranged from 3 to 5 % and the error in the liquid density predictions ranged from 6 to 12 %. Recently, Peneloux et al. developed a method of improving the volumetric predictions by introducing a third parameter into a two-parameter cubic EOS. This method is particularly attractive because the third parameter does not change the vapor/liquid equilibrium conditions determined by the unmodified, two-parameter equation, but modifies the phase volumes by effecting certain translations along the volume axis. Thus, if a given reservoir fluid is already characterized for use in some two-parameter EOS, the application of the PRF method to this fluid requires characterization of only the third parameter. In this work, we apply the PRF method to the PR-EOS. Some background material on the PRF method is given in the next section. For the modified three-parameter PR-EOS, the section Third- Parameter Characterizations for the PR-EOS presents the Parameter Characterizations for the PR-EOS presents the third-parameter values for some lighter hydrocarbons and develops a correlation for characterizing the third parameter for the heptane-plus fractions of reservoir fluids. To apply the modified, three-parameter PR-EOS to calculate the phase and volumetric behavior of reservoir fluids, PR-EOS to calculate the phase and volumetric behavior of reservoir fluids, the section on Applications develops a novel, two-step procedure for characterizing all three parameters for the procedure for characterizing all three parameters for the heptane-plus fractions. The first step characterizes the two parameters of the unmodified PR-EOS with the phase-behavior data derived from the analysis of conventional laboratory experiments. The second step adjusts the correlation coefficients of the third-parameter correlation mentioned earlier, using the heptane-plus density data a standard conditions. Also presented in this section is the application of the modified PR-EOS to several crude-oil and gas-condensate systems. PRF Method PRF Method Consider one mole of a mixture of n components of composition zi, at temperature T and pressure p, obeying an EOS of the formwhere V is the molar volume. Assuming that at the thermodynamic equilibrium, the mixture may split at most into two distinct phases, we can determine the phase properties by solving the following wellposed system of (2n + 3) equations in (2n + 3) unknowns. The equations areandwhere the unknowns are fL, xi, yi, V, and Vg. Here fL denotes the mole fraction of liquid phase. (xi, V ) and yi, Vg) denote the composition and the molar volume of the liquid and gas phases, respectively. Eqs. 2 and 4 apply to each Component i and thus pose 2n equations in total. Subscripts and superscriptsand g denote the liquid and gas phases, respectively. Eq. 4 is the thermodynainic-equilibrium condition for each Component i and equates the fugacity of each component in equilibrium phases. Phi i is the fugacity coefficient for Component i and can be evaluated from the functional form of the Eq. 1 EOS. Eq. 2 is the material-balance equation for each component, while Eq. 3 represents the overall material balance. Eqs. 5 and 6 related the molar volume of each equilibrium phase to its composition, temperature, and pressure through the Eq. 1 EOS. pressure through the Eq. 1 EOS. Two-parameter cubic EOS's mentioned earlier form Eq. 1 as a third-degree polynomial in molar volume V and have two mixture parameters, a and b, related to the component parameters, ai and bi, parameters, a and b, related to the component parameters, ai and bi, through the following mixing rules:andSPERE P. 1033

Performance of Cubic Eos At High Pressures

“…The results obtained are quite satisfactory, even at very high pressures and temperatures. Equivalent results are obtained with the PR EoS and the volume translation of Jhaveri and Youngren (1984).…”

Non-Equilibrium Phase Behavior of Hydrocarbons in Compositional Simulations and Upscaling

“…The system (2), based on a cubic equation of state, e.g., Peng-Robinson equation of state [18,31], corresponds to the condition of minimum Gibbs energy of an equilibrium hydrocarbon mixture, which is equivalent to the equality of component fugacities (chemical potentials) in coexisting phases.…”

“…A pVT-model of the gas-condensate system is based on the Peng-Robinson three-parameter equation of state [18,31] and well-known methods of phase behavior simulations for multicomponent hydrocarbon systems [23,24]. The pVT-model has been matched to results of lab experiments using the method described in [36].…”

Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation

“…Further details of this procedure can be found in Perschke (1988). A volume-shift approach based on the work of Jhaveri and Youngren (1988) is also available for liquid density correction.…”