1984
DOI: 10.1364/ol.9.000211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-photon-excited fluorescence detection of atomic hydrogen in an atmospheric-pressure flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work was followed shortly by flame detection of 0 (Ref. 7) and H. 8 , 9 The combination of imaging and multiphoton absorption LIF experiments was also recently report- In this Letter we describe the simultaneous detection of NO and NO 2 by using one laser pulse at 452 nm. This wavelength induces a two-photon transition in the -y band at 226 nm of NO with subsequent fluorescence in the UV spectral region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This work was followed shortly by flame detection of 0 (Ref. 7) and H. 8 , 9 The combination of imaging and multiphoton absorption LIF experiments was also recently report- In this Letter we describe the simultaneous detection of NO and NO 2 by using one laser pulse at 452 nm. This wavelength induces a two-photon transition in the -y band at 226 nm of NO with subsequent fluorescence in the UV spectral region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Extensions of these techniques to other species have been reported by Alden et al (1984c) for measurement of O2, fo llowed by R detection (Alden et al 1984a) and CO (Alden et al 1984b) in a combusting environment. Atomic hydrogen has been measured by Goldsmith & Anderson (1985) using a two-step saturated fluorescence spectroscopy technique.…”
Section: Laser-induced Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schemes for excitation of H-atom LIF in flames include two-photon ðk ¼ 205 nmÞ excitation to Hðn ¼ 3Þ [5][6][7], three-photon ðk ¼ 292 nmÞ excitation to Hðn ¼ 4Þ [8,9], and two-step, three-photon ðk 1 ¼ 243 nm; k 2 ¼ 656 nmÞ excitation Hðn ¼ 3Þ via the Hðn ¼ 2Þ intermediate level [10]. The latter two schemes have significant disadvantages for LIF imaging measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%