2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Principles to Use in Streamlining Water Quality Research through Data Uniformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, water bodies with strong human influence are extremely difficult to model and upscale because predictor datasets on activities such as point source discharge, water withdrawals, and reservoir releases are limited or not easily reusable. Thus many observations are underutilized for ML despite large-scale consolidation efforts such as the Water Quality Portal and GLORICH databases (Hartmann et al, 2014;, because it is labor-intensive to harmonize and process data (Shaughnessy et al, 2019;Sprague et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Availability Integration Processing and Representation ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, water bodies with strong human influence are extremely difficult to model and upscale because predictor datasets on activities such as point source discharge, water withdrawals, and reservoir releases are limited or not easily reusable. Thus many observations are underutilized for ML despite large-scale consolidation efforts such as the Water Quality Portal and GLORICH databases (Hartmann et al, 2014;, because it is labor-intensive to harmonize and process data (Shaughnessy et al, 2019;Sprague et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Availability Integration Processing and Representation ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, water bodies with strong human influence are extremely difficult to model and upscale because predictor datasets on activities such as point source discharge, water withdrawals, and reservoir releases are limited or not easily reusable. Thus many observations are underutilized for ML despite large‐scale consolidation efforts such as the Water Quality Portal and GLORICH databases (Hartmann et al, 2014; Read et al, 2017), because it is labor‐intensive to harmonize and process data (Shaughnessy et al, 2019; Sprague et al, 2017). Recent efforts to make water data more broadly available and usable such as the U.S. Open Water Data Initiative and the California open water data system are essential for effective management and decision making (Blodgett et al, 2015; Cantor et al, 2021; Larsen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Considerations For the Use Of ML In Water Quality Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even where geochemical data are already compiled and accessible in one place such as the National Water Quality Portal (USGS/EPA), the data are not harmonized, i.e., units, formats, analytical methods, detection limits, and other parameters are not presented consistently (e.g. SPRAGUE et al, 2016;SHAUGHNESSY et al, 2019). Apparently, data standards for agreed-upon units and measurement protocols have never emerged because i) communities have never felt enough need for or placed enough value on such standardization or ii) variations in protocols were simply necessary to answer the proposed research questions.…”
Section: Lack Of Best Practices Standards and Harmonization For Ltgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, soil and water quality data are often prized by decision-makers and the scientific community alike. On the other hand, if a decision-maker or scientist or member of the public must peruse multiple publications and web pages to pull together a dataset, or to adjust the units of a dataset (SHAUGHNESSY et al, 2019), the time needed for such discovery and harmonization can preclude time for deep analysis (LIU et al, 2020). Publicly accessible geochemical databases also accelerate collaboration among scientists and across disciplines and help to promote dialogue with the public (CHRISTENSEN et al, 2009;BRANTLEY et al, 2018).…”
Section: Lesson 1 Improving the Accessibility Of Geochemical Data Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation