“…Too often the migration 'problematic' is framed in terms that only reify the nation-state, privilege sedentarism, and reduce accounts of movement to shallow economic drivers and consequences (Carling and Collins, 2018;Nail, 2015). By contrast, experimentation with ideas from poststructural (Collins, 2018), feminist (Bastia, 2014), new materialist (Nail, 2015), and postcolonial (Grappi, 2013) social theory offer scope to recentre migrant lives, and crucially to open up understandings of migration as enduring, mutable, and directed towards but not determined by the temporal articulation of present, past, and future. Incremental and partial as they all are, such interventions are critical to recasting migration studies in a manner that makes it possible for scholarship itself to be more than just a support structure for the codification of migrants, the evaluation of mobile people's worthiness, and the maintenance of repressive forms of state-centred power (c.f.…”