1996
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three quaternary structures for a single protein.

Abstract: The structure of a multisubunit protein (immunoglobulin light chain) was solved in three crystal forms, differing only in the solvent of crystallization. The three structures were obtained at high ionic strength and low pH, high ionic strength and high pH, and low ionic strength and neutral pH. The three resulting "snapshots" of possible structures show that their variable-domain interactions differ, reflecting their stabilities under specific solvent conditions. In the three crystal forms, the variable domain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ca distribution was also distorted in the C domains, 1.24,~, compared with 0.51 ,~ for the correct structure, though the C domains were in approximately correct positions. The r.m.s, deviation found for the V and C domains in the correct Cle structure is similar to that observed in three different crystal forms of the Loc protein (Huang et al, 1996), determined with 2.3 ,~, resolution data. In another immunoglobulin structure, CD4, the r.m.s.…”
Section: Structure Determination: Molecular Replacementsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ca distribution was also distorted in the C domains, 1.24,~, compared with 0.51 ,~ for the correct structure, though the C domains were in approximately correct positions. The r.m.s, deviation found for the V and C domains in the correct Cle structure is similar to that observed in three different crystal forms of the Loc protein (Huang et al, 1996), determined with 2.3 ,~, resolution data. In another immunoglobulin structure, CD4, the r.m.s.…”
Section: Structure Determination: Molecular Replacementsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The angle between the local twofold axis of the V domain dimer and the local twofold axis of the C domain dimer defines the 'elbow' bend. The structures of 2I light-chain dimer Loc Schiffer et al, 1989;Huang, Ainsworth, Stevens & Schiffer, 1996) and £II/V light-chain dimer Mcg (Schiffer, Girling, Ely & Edmundson, 1973;Ely, Herron, Harker & Edmundson, 1989) have been previously determined; they were crystallized from several solvents. The Bence-Jones protein from patient Cle was characterized serologically and by its aminoacid sequence as a 211I light chain with Mcg-Kern-Ozconstant region (Eulitz, Murphy, Weiss & Solomon, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the latter were amino-acid residues A28 (Asp), A53 (Val), B53 (Val), A156 (Asp) and B214 (Thr). The first two residues belong to CDR loops 1 and 2 and were also found to be in disallowed regions in the other crystal forms, as well as in other -type light-chain dimers (Furey et al, 1983;Ely et al, 1989;Huang, Ainsworth, Stevens et al, 1996;Terzyan et al, 2003). Torsional strain is possibly the cause of these frequent outliers, since they are involved in tight -type (CDR-1) and -type (CDR-2) turns.…”
Section: P4 3 2 1 2 Crystal Formmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This angle may vary even among members of a single BJ population. A number of BJ protein structures have been determined using X-ray crystallography, each unique in sequence, antigen specificity, domain dispositions and other detailed features (Epp et al, 1975;Furey et al, 1983;Ely et al, 1989;Huang et al, 1994;Huang, Ainsworth, Solomon et al, 1996;Huang, Ainsworth, Stevens et al, 1996;Roussel et al, 1999;Terzyan et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular weight of a Bence-Jones !-type light chain is 22 000±24 000 Da, but these invariably associate to form dimers of twice this weight (Bernier & Putnam, 1963). The structures of a number of BenceJones proteins have been determined by X-ray crystallography (Bourne et al, 2002;Ely et al, 1989;Huang, Ainsworth, Solomon et al, 1996;Huang, Ainsworth, Stevens et al, 1996), each unique in sequence and antigen speci®city and therefore in detailed features. For example, the paired constant domains and the paired variable domains of the dimer are related by an elbow angle, as are the same pairs of domains in an Fab, and this varies among Bence-Jones proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%