2013
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2013.2270411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Round Adaptive Diagnosis in Hierarchical Multiprocessor Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a completely connected system, it has been demonstrated that the number of tests required and deemed adequate to identify at most t faulty processors decreases from Nt to N + t − 1 under the PMC model [21]. In addition, several well-known adaptive diagnosis algorithms for interconnected network topologies have been investigated, such as hypercube networks [22,23], hierarchical multiprocessor systems [24], butterfly networks [25], and Hamiltonian networks [26]. However, the existing fault diagnosis schemes for DCNs generally lack adaptability and exhibit low diagnostic efficiency [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a completely connected system, it has been demonstrated that the number of tests required and deemed adequate to identify at most t faulty processors decreases from Nt to N + t − 1 under the PMC model [21]. In addition, several well-known adaptive diagnosis algorithms for interconnected network topologies have been investigated, such as hypercube networks [22,23], hierarchical multiprocessor systems [24], butterfly networks [25], and Hamiltonian networks [26]. However, the existing fault diagnosis schemes for DCNs generally lack adaptability and exhibit low diagnostic efficiency [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexibility of this method increases the efficiency of the diagnosis. For adaptive diagnosis, many interconnection networks have been studied, such as butterfly networks [26], hypercubes [5,6,12], twisted cubes [27], hierarchical crossed cube [14], and dual cube [2]. Previous studies have demonstrated that, while locating f < n/2 faults requires worst-case time of at least f in the nonadaptive setting, adaptive diagnosis can locate less than n/2 faults among n in constant time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%