Magnetic properties of pentacoordinate complexes of the type [Co(bzimpy)X 2 ], X = Cl and Br, were investigated in DC and AC modes. The DC data shows sizeable zero-field splitting for these complexes. The AC susceptibility data confirms Cobalt(II) complexes are known as systems with a considerable magnetic anisotropy, which manifests itself in anomalies of the magnetic functions, such as vs. T, T vs. T, and M vs. B. In the case of the orbitally nondegenerate ground term, this is characterized by rather large zero-field splitting. [1] Experimental studies about the magnetic anisotropy in d-block complexes dates to the 1960s, appearing in the pioneering works of Figgis and Lewis, and later, in those of Gerloch, and Mitra, for instance. [2] The axial zero-field splitting parameter, D, for tetrahedral systems [CoL 4 ] with an 4 A 2 ground electronic term (two Kramers doublets) can adopt both positive and negative values. For hexacoordinate systems [CoL 4 X 2 ] resembling the compressed tetragonal bipyramid (D 4h symmetry, 4 A 2g ground term, two Kramers doublets), D > 0 always holds true. For the elongated tetragonal bipyramid with an 4 E g ground term (four Kramers doublets), on the contrary, the spin-Hamiltonian formalism fails, and thus, the D parameter is undefined. Systems with the geometry of a tetragonal pyramid (C 4v symmetry) can be modeled by removing one apical ligand (X) from a compressed tetragonal bipyramid to [CoL 4 X], with an increase of the bond angle X-Co-L to about 104°. In this case, the ground term is 4 E (4 Kramers doublets), and again, the spin-Hamiltonian formalism is not applicable. For the ideal trigonal bipyramid (D 3h , 4 A 1 ′ ground state, 2 Kramers doublets), the D parameter is in play. However, for large rhombicity, when |D| ≈ 3E, the sign of the D parameter stays unassigned.Determination of the D values is important from the viewpoint of single-molecule magnetism, since the D parameter en- [a]