2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.83.046409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-wavelength scheme to optimize hohlraum coupling on the National Ignition Facility

Abstract: By using three tunable wavelengths on different cones of laser beams on the National Ignition Facility, numerical simulations show that the energy transfer between beams can be tuned to redistribute the energy within the cones of beams most prone to backscatter instabilities. These radiative hydrodynamics and laser-plasma interaction simulations have been tested against large scale hohlraum experiments with two tunable wavelengths, and reproduce the hohlraum energetics and symmetry. Using a third wavelength pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for accurate prediction of the effects of wavelength tuning on implosion symmetry has built on early models of the linear and non-linear CBET processes observed in experiments specifically designed to study CBET [20][21][22] and produced new models used describe the effect in the fusion target experiments at the NIF. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] These models have shown encouraging correspondence with observations, both in early experiments, 9,10,13,14 and in more recent experiments at the NIF [15][16][17] and have undergone their most precise validation yet in recent experiments with smaller lasers and precise measurements. 28 The development of a robust technology of controlling optical power flow in plasmas now benefits from careful comparison of these models to the existing data base.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The need for accurate prediction of the effects of wavelength tuning on implosion symmetry has built on early models of the linear and non-linear CBET processes observed in experiments specifically designed to study CBET [20][21][22] and produced new models used describe the effect in the fusion target experiments at the NIF. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] These models have shown encouraging correspondence with observations, both in early experiments, 9,10,13,14 and in more recent experiments at the NIF [15][16][17] and have undergone their most precise validation yet in recent experiments with smaller lasers and precise measurements. 28 The development of a robust technology of controlling optical power flow in plasmas now benefits from careful comparison of these models to the existing data base.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, the HFM had made some bold predictions, which appear to have come true. In addition, in this context of the Michel et al [32] work, we can now also explain the single remaining discrepancy on the long list of Section 3, namely the observed drop in T drive with Dl. The total SRS increased with Dl, but, as we now believe, it was lost from the hohlraum by exiting the hohlraum in the unmonitored 23.5 inner beam lines.…”
Section: Energy Balancementioning
confidence: 87%
“…A breakthrough in confirming this prediction came when Divol et al [32] re-interpreted the hard x-ray spectrum, not in terms of a single 30 keV T hot-e and f hot-e , but rather as a 2-temperature distribution:…”
Section: Energy Balancementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To counteract this trend, crossbeam energy transfer (CBET) from the outer to the inner beams can, within a certain limit, be enhanced by increasing the wavelength separation Δλ between these laser beam groups [17][18][19]. On the other hand, we want to keep Δλ low to minimize backscatter and hot electron generation through stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) [20]. Higher-Z (than Au) hohlraums are predicted to help increase the capsule drive at a given P laser and provide a more symmetric hohlraum drive [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%